首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从经验到法则:经验在事实认定过程中的引入与规制
引用本文:吴洪淇.从经验到法则:经验在事实认定过程中的引入与规制[J].法律与医学杂志,2011(2).
作者姓名:吴洪淇
作者单位:厦门大学法学院;
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目“法官运用证据经验规则实证研究(项目批准号:09YJC820114)”基金资助
摘    要:从事实认定制度发展的历程来看,经验法则是为将经验引入事实认定过程中并对其加以有效控制的一种独特机制。这种机制在大陆法系和英美法系有着不同的表述形式和内在制约机制。在我国,经验法则和法律推定是将经验引入事实认定过程的两种不同机制,它们在立法和司法实践中都存在某种程度的失控状态。这种失控状态的产生源于其内在制约机制的缺陷。只有从制约机制入手才能有效保障经验在事实认定过程得到恰当的运用。

关 键 词:经验  经验法则  事实认定  推定  盖然性  

From Experience to Rule:Introduction and Regulation of Experience in the Process of Fact-finding
Wu Hongqi,Ph.D in law,Lecturer of Law School of Xiamen University,..From Experience to Rule:Introduction and Regulation of Experience in the Process of Fact-finding[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2011(2).
Authors:Wu Hongqi  PhD in law  Lecturer of Law School of Xiamen University  
Institution:Wu Hongqi,Ph.D in law,Lecturer of Law School of Xiamen University,100088.
Abstract:In the history of fact-finding system,we can find that the experience rule is one special mechanism which was made for channeling experience into the process of fact-finding.This mechanism has different expressions and constraints in the Anglo-American law system and Civil law system.The experience rule and legal presumption are two different mechanisms to channel experience into the process of fact-finding in China,and they are both,to some degree,out of control due to the defects of their inner constraint...
Keywords:Experience  Experience rule  Fact-finding  Presumption  Probability  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号