| 海盗羁押不构成停租——评2010年the“Cosco Bulk Carrier v．Team—Up Owning”案 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张丽英,杜康平.海盗羁押不构成停租——评2010年the“Cosco Bulk Carrier v．Team—Up Owning”案[J].中国海商法年刊,2011,22(1):92-97. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张丽英 杜康平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学,国际法学院,北京,100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 简要介绍the“Cosco Bulk Carrierv．Team—Up Owning”案的案情。按照争点审理的顺序，分别分析法庭对纽约租约停租条款中“海损事故”“不履行职责”“其他原因”等词的解释，提出可能的与判决相反的解释，论证法院判决的合理性。最后得出结论，出于公平分担船方和租方所负担的风险的目的，法院判决海盗羁押不构成停租。
|
| 关 键 词： | 海盗羁押 纽约土产格式合同 停租 合约的解释方法 |
Detention by pirates does not make a charterparty off-hire——an analysis of the 2010 case "Cosco Bulk Carrier v.Team-Up Owning" |
| |
| ZHANG Li-ying,DU Kang-ping.Detention by pirates does not make a charterparty off-hire——an analysis of the 2010 case "Cosco Bulk Carrier v.Team-Up Owning"[J].Annual of China Maritime Law,2011,22(1):92-97. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Li-ying DU Kang-ping |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Li-ying,DU Kang-ping(Faculty of International Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | This article first of all briefs the factual elements of the case Cosco Bulk Carrier v.Team-Up Owning.Then it analyses the interpretations given by the court to the following three phrases,namely average accident,default of men,and any other cause from NYPE 46 off-hire clause respectively,points out possible interpretations contrary to the court's judgment and proves the reasonableness of the court's judgment.It is concluded that the court's decision that the detention by pirates does not make a charterpart... |
| |
| Keywords: | detention by pirates NYPE46 off-hire the interpretation of contracts |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
