| 双务合同履行中的抗辩权比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邱业伟.双务合同履行中的抗辩权比较分析[J].河北法学,2007,25(7):114-118. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邱业伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆邮电大学,重庆,400065 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《中华人民共和国合同法》第66条、第67条、第68条、第69条规定了双务合同履行的同时履行抗辩权、先履行抗辩权和不安抗辩权.在立法上解决了守约方履行合同义务可能造成无法补救的损失,不履行合同义务又要承担违约责任的矛盾,是我国合同立法的重大进步.对同时履行抗辩权、先履行抗辩权和不安抗辩权进行比较分析,具有积极的理论和现实意义.
|
| 关 键 词： | 双务合同 抗辩权 共同 区别 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2007)07-0114-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年3月9日 |
Rights to Counterpleas in Contract Performance |
| |
| QIU Ye-wei.Rights to Counterpleas in Contract Performance[J].Hebei Law Science,2007,25(7):114-118. |
| |
| Authors: | QIU Ye-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinese Contract Law incorporates the rights to simultaneous performance counterplea,first-perform counterplea and uneasy counterplea respectively in its article 66,67,68 and 69,thus the difficult situation of non-breacher to the contract has been overcome in which non-remediable damage will be caused to him if he performs his duty or he will be liable for the breach of contract if he doesn't perform his duty.Aims to provide a comparison between simultaneous performance counterplea,first-perform counterplea and uneasy counterplea. |
| |
| Keywords: | mutual contract right to plea common difference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
