| 家事事件程序的法理分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张晓茹.家事事件程序的法理分析[J].河北法学,2006,24(6):70-72. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张晓茹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京航空航天大学,法学院,北京100083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 台湾学者邱联恭教授提出了诉讼法理与非讼法理交错适用理论,家事事件程序交错适用诉讼法理和非讼法理是必要的和可能的,通常有三种情形.家事诉讼与非讼的集中交错以裁量权和对审权为中心.家事审判职权主义的特征使它与非讼程序有着某些相统点,因此家事诉讼事件可以一定程度的非讼化.
|
| 关 键 词： | 诉讼法理与非讼法理交错 家事事件程序法理 非讼化 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2006)06-0070-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月6日 |
Legal Theory Analysis of Family Affairs Judgment Procedure |
| |
| ZHANG Xiao-ru.Legal Theory Analysis of Family Affairs Judgment Procedure[J].Hebei Law Science,2006,24(6):70-72. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Xiao-ru |
| |
| Abstract: | Taiwan professor Qiu Liangong puts forward the theory of proceedings and noncontentious proceedings crisscrossing.It is necessary and probable that procedural theory and noncontentious theory are cross applying in family affairs judgment procedure,which includes three conditions.Procedural theory and noncontentious theory crisscross around discretionary powers and adversary rights.Because family affairs judgment procedure with noncontentious proceedings has a certain degree mutually universality,it becomes more possible to family affairs to handle in noncontentious proceedings. |
| |
| Keywords: | procedural theory and noncontentious theory crisscrossing legal theory of family affairs judgment procedure noncontentiousness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
