首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑法第306条存与废:倾听法律职业人的声音
引用本文:李兰英,孙杰,[美]何霓.刑法第306条存与废:倾听法律职业人的声音[J].河北法学,2011,29(10):17-26.
作者姓名:李兰英  孙杰  [美]何霓
作者单位:1. 厦门大学法学院,福建厦门,361005
2. 东北大学犯罪学与刑事司法学院,美国波士顿02115
基金项目:美国麦克阿瑟基金会研究项目~~
摘    要:刑法第306条(又称律师伪证罪)从其诞生之日起就面临着当存还是当废的巨大争议,这些争议或来自学理或来自实践中的相关利益群体。2009年底至2010年初的李庄案再次使得这一争论从幕后转至台前。通过考察法律职业人对第306条的真实态度,可以深入地发掘争议背后的社会因素:即司法机关观念上的误区;诉讼结构的不合理;追诉程序上的瑕疵,从而从实体和程序上为刑法第306条的未来寻求一条理性的出路———存而慎用。

关 键 词:刑法第306条  存与废  法律职业人  存而慎用

Remained or Repealed of Penal Code 306:Listen to the Legal Professional Persons' Opinions
LI Lan-ying,SUN Jie,HE Ni.Remained or Repealed of Penal Code 306:Listen to the Legal Professional Persons' Opinions[J].Hebei Law Science,2011,29(10):17-26.
Authors:LI Lan-ying  SUN Jie  HE Ni
Institution:LI Lan-ying1,SUN Jie1,HE Ni2(1.School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005 China,2.School of Criminology and Criminal Justice,Northeast University,Boston 02115 USA)
Abstract:Penal Code 306 has been faced with controversy which should be remained or be repealed all the times from its birth which is from theories or interests groups in practice.This controversy is made from backstage to stage because of case of Li Zhuang which happened from late 2009 to early 2010.We can deeply explore the social factors behind the controversy : misunderstanding of judicial organization;unreasonable of criminal structure;and defect of prosecution procedure through investigating the legal professi...
Keywords:Penal Code 306  remained and repealed  legal professional persons  remained and applied cautiously  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号