首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事司法中的规范创制行为及其规制——以审判中心主义为视角
引用本文:马勇.刑事司法中的规范创制行为及其规制——以审判中心主义为视角[J].河北法学,2020,38(1):150-164.
作者姓名:马勇
作者单位:潍坊医学院,山东潍坊,261042
基金项目:山东省高校证据鉴识重点实验室(山东政法学院)开放课题《面向司法的数字取证模型研究》(KFKT(SUPL)-201412)
摘    要:审判中心主义的确立是一个系统工程,纠正程序法层面上的侦查中心主义确属必要,但是在公安司法机关的“规范创制活动”中也存在一种侦查中心主义的倾向,值得警惕。公安司法机关的规范创制活动在诸多方面掣肘了法官的个案解释活动,造成了庭审虚化,背离了审判中心主义的要求。国家应在规范创制活动的权力配置、审查方式等方面加以改革,以实现法制统一和个案公正的有效衔接,保证审判中心主义的全方位确立。

关 键 词:审判中心主义  规范创制行为  庭审实质化  侦查中心主义  法律解释

Normative Creation and its Regulation in Criminal Justice——From the perspective of judgment centralism
MA Yong.Normative Creation and its Regulation in Criminal Justice——From the perspective of judgment centralism[J].Hebei Law Science,2020,38(1):150-164.
Authors:MA Yong
Institution:(Weifang Medical College,Weifang 261042,China)
Abstract:The establishment of judgment centralism is a systematic project. It is indeed necessary to correct the investigation centralism at the level of procedural law.However,there is also a tendency of investigative centralism in the “normative creation activities ” of the investigative and judicial organs, which deserves vigilance. The normative creation activities of the investigative and judicial organs have constrained the judge’s case interpretation activities in many aspects,resulting in the falsification of the trial and the departure from the requirements of judgment centrism. Our country should reform the power allocation and review methods of standardizing the creation activities to achieve an effective connection between the legal system and the case justice, and ensure the all-round establishment of judgment centralism.
Keywords:judgment centralism  normative creation activities  substantiation of trial  investigative centralism  legal interpretation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号