| 论我国刑罚理论研究中的四个误区——刑罚目的一元论之提出 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王刚.论我国刑罚理论研究中的四个误区——刑罚目的一元论之提出[J].法学论坛,2012(1):116-121. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学法学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 皮勇教授主持的教育部专题项目《我国量刑规范化改革基本理论与方法》(09YJCA820058);湖北省检察院重点项目《量刑规范化与量刑建议的基本理论》(HJ2010A10)的部分研究成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国刑罚理论研究中存在四个误区:混淆了刑法目的与刑罚目的;对刑罚目的的含义理解错误;把一般预防当作刑罚目的;把报应当作刑罚目的。通过对这四个误区的厘清,可以得出以下结论:刑法目的与刑罚目的是两个不同的概念;刑罚目的,是指国家通过适用和执行刑罚所期望达到的目标;一般预防是刑法目的,不是刑罚目的;报应是刑罚的本质,不是刑罚目的;刑罚的目的是特殊预防。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法目的 刑罚目的 一般预防 特殊预防 报应 |
On the Four Misunderstandings in the Research of Punishment Theory in China |
| |
| WANG Gang.On the Four Misunderstandings in the Research of Punishment Theory in China[J].Legal Forum,2012(1):116-121. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Gang |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Gang(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Four misunderstandings exists in the research of punishment theory in China,they are confusing the purpose of criminal law and the purpose of punishment;misunderstanding the concept of the purpose of criminal law;treating the general prevention as the purpose of punishment and treating retribution as the purpose of punishment.Through the clarification of these four misunderstandings can we draw the following conclusions: the purpose of punishment and the purpose of criminal law are two different concepts;the purpose of punishment is the objective of the application and enforcement of punishment by States;general prevention is the purpose of criminal law and not the purpose of punishment;retribution is the essence of punishment and not the purpose of punishment;the purpose of punishment is special prevention. |
| |
| Keywords: | the purpose of criminal law the purpose of punishment four misunderstandings general prevention special prevention retribution |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
