首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

利于第三人合同研究
引用本文:朱岩.利于第三人合同研究[J].法律科学,2005,23(5):55-63.
作者姓名:朱岩
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院 北京100872
摘    要:利于第三人合同分为非真正和真正两种,本文仅考察后者。利于第三人合同与代理制度、债权转让以及赠与等制度都存在根本区别。从罗马法到当代各国民法典及其他民事立法,利于第三人合同制度经历了从禁止到许可并不断完善的过程。该制度涉及到三方法律关系,此种复杂的三方法律关系还表现在抗辩和不当得利等复杂关系上。我国《合同法》第64条并没有规定真正利于第三人合同,应就此作出修订。

关 键 词:利于第三人合同  第三人  基础关系  原因关系  不当得利  抗辩
文章编号:1671-6914(2005)05-0055-(09)
修稿时间:2005年3月20日

Studies on Contracts in Favor of the Third Party
ZHU Yan.Studies on Contracts in Favor of the Third Party[J].Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law),2005,23(5):55-63.
Authors:ZHU Yan
Abstract:Contracts in favor of the third party can be divided into genuine and non-genuine categories. This article only deals with the genuine genre which differs from the institution of agency, assignment and donation. The institution of contracts in favor of the third party has experienced the process in which it had been at first prohibited in the Roman law and finally admitted as the society developed. Actually, the contracts in favor of the third party have triangle legal relations between creditor, debtor and the third party from which arise many complex legal problems such as the triangle restitution because of unjust enrichment and different defenses. Article 64 of Contract Law of the PRC does not regulate the genuine contracts in favor of the third party so that it must be revised.
Keywords:Contracts in favor of the third party  the third party  basic relation  causa relation  unjust enrichment  defense
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号