比较刑事诉讼法的研究进路：从划分模式到探求共性

目前在世界范围内刑事诉讼法比较研究的主流进路是划分刑事诉讼程序模式。达马斯卡的审问/对抗模式和阶层/同位模式是这种进路的代表。唯模式论者往往关注刑事诉讼程序的差异而忽视它们的相似之处。本文参考英格拉姆对于不同法域刑事诉讼程序共性的探讨,提出比较刑事诉讼法还应采用探求共性的进路,寻求相互理解的比较。内容提要：目前在世界范围内刑事诉讼法比较研究的主流进路是划分刑事诉讼程序模式。达马斯卡的审问/对抗模式和阶层/同位模式是这种进路的代表。唯模式论者往往关注刑事诉讼程序的差异而忽视它们的相似之处。本文参考英格拉姆对于不同法域刑事诉讼程序共性的探讨,提出比较刑事诉讼法还应采用探求共性的进路,寻求相互理解的比较。

Approaches to Comparative Criminal Procedure: from Dividing Models to Seeking Commonalities

At present, the mainstream approach to comparative criminal procedure is to divide criminal procedure models. This approach is represented by inquisitorial/adversarial model-divides and hierarchical/coordinate model-divides created by Damaka. The followers of this approach usually look at the divergences between different criminal procedures rather than the similarities. This thesis will make reference to the commonalities amongst criminal procedures in different jurisdictions studied by Ingraham. I intend to propose that an approach of exploring commonalities should be used for comparative criminal procedure. By means of this approach, a comparison with mutual understanding between different systems can be sought.