法院内部控制刑事裁判权的方法与反思

我国法院内部对刑事裁判权的控制有着独特的方法与逻辑。在方法上,有严格的流程监控和细密的考核指标,即过程控制与结果控制。这种控制刑事裁判的方法体现了独特的制度逻辑,而制度实践者则基于不同的动因或主动或被动地选择了该方法。法院内部控权模式有利有弊,总体来说,过程控制在一定程度上消解了结果控制的效果,结果控制则又在一定程度上加强了过程控制,如此循环导致对刑事裁判权的控制不但成效不大,且产生了一定的副作用。法院内部控权模式存在双重悖论,未来对刑事裁判权的控制应遵循基本的司法规律。

Approaches and Review of Internal Control of Criminal Adjudication within Courts

The internal control of criminal adjudication within China＇ s courts has unique approach and logic. The approach of strict process monitoring and delicate evaluation standards can be summarized as proce- dural control and result control. This approach reflects unique system logic, by which the practitioners with va- rious motives choose the approach either actively or passively. The internal control within courts has both ad- vantages and disadvantages. Generally speaking, the process control can dissipate the effects of result control to some extent while the result control can partially intensify the procedural control. Such circulation has little positive effect on control of criminal adjudication and even has side - effect. With regard to this dual paradox, it is suggested that the control of criminal adjudication in the future should follow the fundamental judicial rules.