首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

也论许霆案的定性
引用本文:刘彦辉.也论许霆案的定性[J].北方法学,2008,2(6).
作者姓名:刘彦辉
作者单位:黑龙江大学法学院
摘    要:许霆案的判决定性和量刑存在一定的问题,许霆的行为不符合秘密窃取的行为类型,以盗窃罪定性并不准确;许霆的行为是侵占遗忘物,应评价为侵占罪。许霆案的生效判决不但在定性上是不恰当的,而且即便假设许霆案可以认定为盗窃罪,其生效判决的量刑理由也存在一定的不合理之处。

关 键 词:秘密窃取  行为类型  遗忘物  特殊减轻处罚权

Still on the Nature Judgment of Xu Ting Case
LIU Yan-hui.Still on the Nature Judgment of Xu Ting Case[J].Northern Legal Science,2008,2(6).
Authors:LIU Yan-hui
Abstract:The judgment of crime and its sentence of Xu Ting case is still under controversy,since his conducts do not conform to the category of secretly stealing,thus it is incorrect to judge the case as crime of theft. Actually,the conduct of Xu Ting is that of embezzlement of one's lost property,and accordingly it should be judged as crime of embezzlement. The enforced judgment is improper in nature,moreover,even if the crime of theft is accepted; the ground for its sentence is still unjustifiable.
Keywords:secretly stealing  conduct category  one's lost property  power of special penalty mitigation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号