首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Critiquing the U.S. characterization,attribution and retaliation laws and policies for cyberattacks
Institution:1. Junior Researcher in iBOF project ‘Future-proofing human rights, Developing thicker forms of accountability’, PhD Student at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium;2. Senior Researcher in iBOF project ‘Future-proofing human rights, Developing thicker forms of accountability’, Full Professor at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium;1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark;2. Graduate School of International and Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, Republic of Korea;1. School of Cyberspace Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China;2. School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China;1. Postdoctoral Researcher in Law and Artificial Intelligence, University of Tübingen, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz, D-72074, Tübingen, Germany;2. Professor of Law and Artificial Intelligence, University of Tübingen, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz, D-72074, Tübingen, Germany
Abstract:This paper critiques the U.S. characterization, attribution, and retaliation laws and policies for cyberattacks. Characterization, attribution, and retaliation are part of the most important aspects of responding to cyberattacks. The U.S. does not have a clearly defined characterization process, other than the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s Threat Table which characterizes the different motivations for carrying out cyberattacks by cyber threat actors. This Threat Table has hardly changed since 2005, yet, cyber threat actors continually develop their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and conceal their real motivations for carrying out cyberattacks. Like characterization, the U.S. does not have a known attribution procedure, nor is a single agency tasked with the function of attribution. Different agencies – the Department of Justice (DoJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force (NCIJTF), and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) – and even private sectors companies, participate in the attribution process. This invites potential contradiction and interference with the attribution process. Though, unlike characterization and attribution, the U.S. retaliation policies are contained in different documents, none has the preciseness required to be effective. This paper thus, makes recommendations for each of these aspects of cyberattack response.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号