首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


DNA evidence in South Africa: Lessons learned to date
Institution:1. DNAbiotec (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, South Africa;2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;1. GENES Ltda, Medellín, Colombia;2. Instituto de Biología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia;3. Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia;4. Universidad de Pamplona, Colombia;5. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia;1. Laboratorio de Genética Molecular de Cruz Vital – Cruz Roja Ecuatoriana Quito, Ecuador;2. Laboratorio GENES Ltda, Medellin, Colombia;1. Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, United States;2. American Registry of Pathology, United States;3. Flinders University, Australia;4. National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States;1. School of Forensic and Investigative Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK;2. Key Forensic Services, DNA Division, Norwich, UK
Abstract:A trend was noted over the past 15 years in the South African courts. This trend has a multi-factorial origin and highlights the problems faced in the use of forensic science evidence in court. Although there have been improvements on how DNA evidence is gathered and presented in court, due to the fact that certain cases have been contested at the DNA evidence level, multiple issues remain that have not yet been addressed when DNA evidence is submitted to court. These issues include: accreditation, regulation of the forensic science profession, continued education, training of court officials, quality assurance, biased testimony, lack of transparency with regard to processes and procedures followed in the forensic community, incorrect interpretation of DNA evidence, lack of scientific knowledge (including the scientific method) by DNA experts, awareness by the legal profession and an over emphasis on the prosecuting perspective. These same aspects continue to plague current cases. Despite the above, the window of opportunity to address the above has not yet passed. However, it will take continuous and concerted efforts from the scientific and legal professions to bring about the appropriate change to facilitate justice for all in South Africa.
Keywords:Quality assurance  Biased testimony  Accreditation  Regulation of forensic science profession  Continued education
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号