首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再论司法鉴定基本问题--兼评《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》有关条款
引用本文:朱晋峰.再论司法鉴定基本问题--兼评《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》有关条款[J].证据科学,2020(2):192-205.
作者姓名:朱晋峰
作者单位:司法鉴定科学研究院上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台
基金项目:国家“十三五”重点研发计划“司法鉴定意见证据评价系统研究”(2016YFC0800707)的阶段性成果。
摘    要:最高法民事证据规定对于完善我国证据体系具有重要意义。此次证据规定,对作为证据体系重要一环的鉴定意见,从实体和程序方面都做了全面规定,对于缓解司法鉴定在民事诉讼中的诸多困境具有重要作用。但其中部分条款也可能对司法鉴定制度产生一定影响。为此,本文对司法鉴定可能会受到一定冲击的鉴定人负责制、鉴定意见撤销等基本内容,再次予以阐释、厘定,以期能确保司法鉴定体系的有效运行。

关 键 词:民事证据规定  鉴定人负责制  鉴定意见撤销

On the basic issues of forensic expertise--Concurrently comment on the relevant provisions of several provisions on evidence in civil procedure
Zhu Jinfeng.On the basic issues of forensic expertise--Concurrently comment on the relevant provisions of several provisions on evidence in civil procedure[J].Evidence Science,2020(2):192-205.
Authors:Zhu Jinfeng
Institution:(Shanghai Forensic Service Platform,Academy of Forensic Science,Shanghai 200063,China)
Abstract:The Provisions of Civil Evidence are of great significance in improving China’s evidence system. The Provisions stipulate appraisal opinions, an important part of the evidence system, comprehensively in terms of substance and procedure, which will play an important role in alleviating the many difficulties of judicial identification in civil litigation. However, some of these provisions may also have a certain impact on the judicial appraisal system. For this reason, this article re-explains the basic content of the appraisal responsibility system and the revocation of appraisal opinions, in order to ensure the effective operation of the judicial appraisal system.
Keywords:Provisions of civil evidence  Appraiser responsibility system  Revocation of appraisal opinions
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号