首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论医疗损害技术鉴定危机与改革
引用本文:刘鑫,梁俊超.论医疗损害技术鉴定危机与改革[J].证据科学,2010,18(4):409-424.
作者姓名:刘鑫  梁俊超
作者单位:证据科学教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学)
基金项目:中国政法大学2008年校级人文社会科学研究项目
摘    要:法律规定的不完善以及法官对鉴定结论的依赖性造成了目前医疗鉴定中,医疗事故技术鉴定与法医学医疗鉴定共存的二元化局面。侵权责任法在民事赔偿上否定了医疗事故的概念,提出以医疗损害责任为核心的民事责任制度,使医疗鉴定面临了新的问题。医疗事故技术鉴定机制和法医学医疗鉴定机制都存在种种缺陷,不能完全满足侵权责任法对医疗鉴定的新的需求。无论是鉴定结论的固有属性还是侵权责任法的新的技术内容都要求对现有的医疗事故技术鉴定模式进行改革,建立起符合《侵权责任法》要求的医疗损害技术鉴定制度。

关 键 词:医疗事故技术鉴定  法医学医疗鉴定  医疗损害技术鉴定  侵权责任法

Crisis And Reform Faced by Authentication For Medical Malpractice
Institution:Liu Xin.Key Laboratory of Evidence Science,Ministry of education,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088.
Abstract:Due to the imperfect laws and regulations,as well as judge's dependence on expert opinion in his/her decision,there is a binary existence of authentication for medical accidents and medical identification by medical jurisprudence at the moment.The Tort Liability Law abandons the concept of medical accidentand sets up a civil liability system oriented in medical malpractice liability.,which raises new problems for medical identification system.There are many flaws in both authentication for medical accidents and medical identification by medical jurisprudence.Neither of them can fully meet the demands of the Tort Liability Law.Either the nature of expert opinion or the new technical content of the Tort Liability Law makes it essential to reform the existing authentication for medical accidents,to establish new system of authentication for medical malpractice in accordance with the Tort Liability Law.
Keywords:Authentication for medical accidents  Medical identification by medical jurisprudence  Authentication for medical malpractice  Tort Liability Law
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号