首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

假释本质研究——兼论假释权的性质及归属
引用本文:柳忠卫.假释本质研究——兼论假释权的性质及归属[J].中国法学,2004(5):112-119.
作者姓名:柳忠卫
作者单位:山东大学法学院
摘    要:假释是一项历史悠久的刑罚执行制度,但刑法理论对假释的本质至今尚未形成统一的认识。在当代,假释已从一种国家对个别罪犯的恩惠演变成罪犯普遍享有的一种权利,是罪犯在自由刑执行过程中保持良善行为的结果。因而,在关于假释本质的各种学说中,假释权利说是合理的。假释权利说是以现代刑法思想为指导的对假释本质的全新的诠释,是国家对罪犯刑罚观念和关系的嬗变在假释本质理论上的具体反映。由假释的本质所决定,假释权应是一种行政权而非司法权,假释权应由行政性质的狱政部门或专门的假释委员会行使。

关 键 词:假释本质  刑罚执行  假释权利说  假释权

On the Nature of Parole
Abstract:The parole is a system of penalty execution with a long history. But the criminal theory has not formed united knowledge about the essence of parole. In modern society, parole has evovled from the grace that the country endow with the individual prisoner to the right which the prisoners enjoy generally. It is the fruit that the prisoners keep good act during the term sentence. The parole right theory is rational in these theories about parole essential theory. Parole right theory is a new explaination about parole essence directed by the modem criminal idea. It reflects the evolving of the punishment idea about the relationship of country and prisoners. The idea of parole right theory dominates the criminal legislation and the judicial practice the essence of parole decides that the parole power is an administrative power other than a judicial power. Parole power should be carried out by the organization of prison administration with administrative character special parole board.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号