首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国行政程序法治化之反思
引用本文:戚建刚,郑理.我国行政程序法治化之反思[J].政法论丛,2014(6):34-40.
作者姓名:戚建刚  郑理
作者单位:中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073
基金项目:本研究受中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助.
摘    要:我国行政程序法治化虽然取得了显著进步,但从比较行政程序法视角和行政程序法在我国行政法治建设中发挥的实际功能与其应有的功能关系之视角这两方面来看,仍然需要对其进行反思。借助马克思·韦伯所倡导的类型分析法为工具,以行政程序法所调整的行政活动类型以及行政主体在该活动中的程序角色为基点,选择行政决定、行政法规、行政规定为变项,可以将我国行政程序法建构成司法模式、立法模式和行政模式的行政程序法。而对我国行政程序法反思之重点就可以借助于司法模式的行政程序法、立法模式的行政程序法和行政模式的行政程序法的分析框架来进行。

关 键 词:行政程序法治化  行政程序法  类型分析法

Reflection on Legalization of China' s Administrative Procedure
Qi Jian-gang,Zheng Li.Reflection on Legalization of China' s Administrative Procedure[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2014(6):34-40.
Authors:Qi Jian-gang  Zheng Li
Institution:( Law School of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan Hubei 430073)
Abstract:The legalization of the administrative procedure had improved in the past twenty years. However, the comparison between the practical function and the expected function of Administrative Procedure Act' s leads to a reason to believe that a reflection on the legalization is essential. Analytic tool and framework are needed in order to effectively reflect on the legalization of the administrative procedure. Judicial form, legislation form, and executive form of Administrative Procedure Act are analyzed by the category analysis method that was advocated by Max We- ber. The three forms are based on the administration regulated activity and the role of administrative subject played in the activity. Administrative decisions, laws and regulations, and provisions are variables that also make up the ju- dicial form, legislation form, and executive form of Administrative Procedure Act.
Keywords:legalization of administrative procedure  Administrative Procedure Act  category analysis method
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号