首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

分立抑或统一:我国公益诉讼制度构建与分歧消解
引用本文:隋洪明.分立抑或统一:我国公益诉讼制度构建与分歧消解[J].政法论丛,2012(2):31-37.
作者姓名:隋洪明
作者单位:西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆,401120
基金项目:山东省十二五省级重点学科——经济法学建设项目的阶段性成果;山东省高校人文社会科学研究计划项目《大气环境应急管理法律制度研究》(J11WB09)的阶段性成果
摘    要:我国公益诉讼制度的缺位与公益诉讼受关注的现实程度极不相称,其根本原因在于理论研究的分歧与对实务运行的担忧,因此,以整体公益诉讼理念为指导,打破民事公益诉讼、行政公益诉讼、环境公益诉讼等部门视域的局限,适应公众迫切期望公益诉讼制度迅速建立的“民心所向”,积极探索统一公益诉讼实务运作路径,构建私权对公权制约的涵盖各类公益诉讼内容的综合公益诉讼制度,允许不特定的合法主体依据法律规定,以自己名义向法院提起公益诉讼,维护国家与社会公共利益,是构建具有中国特色公益诉讼制度的正确选择。

关 键 词:公益诉讼  构建  分歧  消解

Division or Unity: Construction and Differences Elimination of China’s Public Interest Litigation System
Sui Hong-ming.Division or Unity: Construction and Differences Elimination of China’s Public Interest Litigation System[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2012(2):31-37.
Authors:Sui Hong-ming
Institution:Sui Hong-ming(Economic Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)
Abstract:The fundamental reason of absence of public litigation system in China lies in divergence of theoretical research and complexment of practical operation.Under the guidance of public litigation system,it is of importance to construct Chinese characteristic public litigation system covering civil litigation,administrative litigation and criminal litigation,which aims to restrict public right through civil rights,meet the requirements of social people,and allow any specific legal subjects based on laws and regulations on their own behalf to initiate litigation to maintain national and social public interests.
Keywords:public interest litigation  construction  differences  elimination
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号