行政决策的裁量性质及规制动因

为应对社会变迁中的治理困境,行政机关的决策活动越来越多地被赋予了广阔的裁量空间,形成裁量目的手段式的规制技术有别于传统行政裁量的要件效果模式,同时,行政决策与传统行政活动在功能任务类型、合法化逻辑、公共利益客观性等方面的差异也决定了两者迥异的裁量属性.但行政决策中形成裁量的法律规制要区别于传统的行政裁量,重点在于克服民主正当性缺失、实现利益衡量的公正、纠正系统性偏见以及裁量基准的创新.

The Discretionary Nature and the Reason of the Legal Regulation of the Administrative Decision

In order to response to governance dilemma in the social changes,the administrative decision-making activities are in-creasingly being authorized with vast discretionary space,formative discretion is different from traditional administrative discretion intechniques of lagal regulation.Tbe differences in the function,logic of legalization,objectivity of public interest between administrativedecision-making and traditional administrative activities determine the different nature of discretion.Legal regulation of administrativedecision-making is different from the traditional administrative discretion;the emphasis is to overcome the lack of democratic legiti-macy,to achieve justice in the interest measurement,to correct the systemic bias and to innovate discretionary standards.