首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

破产法中法院审判职能的理性回归与改革路径探析
引用本文:陈义华.破产法中法院审判职能的理性回归与改革路径探析[J].行政与法,2012(6):75-78.
作者姓名:陈义华
作者单位:广东肇庆学院,广东肇庆,526061
摘    要:本文认为,新破产法对法院的职能定位存在着公权越位和私权错位的立法失误。当前破产法中法院职能应向"去行政化"与"去民事化"方向改革,以实现破产审判职能的理性回归。在"去行政化"改革方面,可以在现行司法行政体系内设置破产管理人监管处(科)的司法行政管理部门,并推行破产管理人执业许可制度;在"去民事化"改革方面,在破产管理人的选任和报酬确定上,则应实行以债权人会议决定为主、人民法院指定为辅的立法模式。

关 键 词:公权越位  私权错位  审判职能  去行政化  去民事化

Bankruptcy Court Judge in the Function of the Rational Return and Reform Path in this Pape
Chen Yihua.Bankruptcy Court Judge in the Function of the Rational Return and Reform Path in this Pape[J].Public Administration & Law,2012(6):75-78.
Authors:Chen Yihua
Abstract:The functional orientation of new bankruptcy law exists offside public rights and proprietary dislocation of legislative faults.The current in the law the function of the bankruptcy court should be Toward reform to "go administration is changed" and "to the civil",in order to realize the bankruptcy reform trial function the rational return.In terms of reform to "go administration is changed",should be in judicial administrative system installed in bankruptcy administrator supervision(division) in the judicial administrative departments,and promote bankruptcy administrator practice license system;In terms of reform to "to the civil",should determine the creditors’ meeting decided to give priority to,the people’s court to designate as the auxiliary legislation mode in bankruptcy administrator of the selection and reward.
Keywords:offside public fights  proprietary dislocation trial function  go administration is changed  to the civil
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号