首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

现代风险社会中危害性原则的角色定位
引用本文:王耀忠.现代风险社会中危害性原则的角色定位[J].现代法学,2012,34(3):19-27.
作者姓名:王耀忠
作者单位:西北政法大学,陕西 西安,710063
基金项目:陕西省教育厅2010年省级人文社科基地重点科研计划项目“现代风险社会对刑法的挑战”(2010JZ40)
摘    要:功利制约正义的国权主义刑法思想会使刑法成为控制风险与不安全性的重要工具,促使危害性原则内涵不断膨胀,刑法的社会机能随之扩张并使危害性原则的人权保障机能与批判机能逐渐丧失。在现代风险社会语境下,以保障人权、自由为本位的人本主义刑法理念仍然是立法与司法的基本准则。风险的控制应该是有梯度的,危害性原则必须与刑法谦抑思想并用才能成为刑事立法的指导原则;必须在形式的构成要件框架内,在形式理性优先于实质理性的前提下才能成为刑事司法的指导原则。

关 键 词:危害性原则  风险控制  人权保障  形式理性  角色定位

Harm Principle in the Modern Risk Society
WANG Yao-zhong.Harm Principle in the Modern Risk Society[J].Modern Law Science,2012,34(3):19-27.
Authors:WANG Yao-zhong
Institution:WANG Yao-zhong (Northwest University of Politics and Law,Shanxi Xi’an 710063,China)
Abstract:The statist criminal doctrine preferring utilitarianism rather than justice might make criminal law a dominant instrument to respond to risk and insecurity so as to extend excessively the connotation of the harm principle and lead to criminal law’s unlimited expansion of its social function while the harm principle’s loss of its human rights protection and critical functions.In the context of the modern risk society,humanist philosophy based on human rights protection and freedom is still the principal test in criminal legislative and judicial areas.Criminal law should be the last resort to risk management.To be held as the guiding principle,the harm principle must be employed together with the modest and suppression doctrine of the criminal law,within the formal framework of the constituent elements,and in the premise of formal rationality prior to substantial rationality.
Keywords:harm principle  risk control  human rights protection  formal rationality  role
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号