首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论私法上的合意及其判定
引用本文:冉克平.论私法上的合意及其判定[J].现代法学,2014,36(5):49-60.
作者姓名:冉克平
作者单位:华中科技大学法学院,湖北武汉,430074
基金项目:华中科技大学自主创新研究基金项目(人文社会科学类)“用他人名义实施法律行为的效果分析”
摘    要:合意是对当事人的客观表示进行解释而形成的一致。在表示内容引起争议时,应对表意人的表达与受领人的信赖附加可归责性要件,以此作为判定合意的价值基础。当事人约定的对能够成为法律秩序所认可的行为达成的一致是合意的最低限度(确定性),其他条款可以透过补充解释以及任意性规范予以填补。"镜像规则"已不能完全适应交易的需要,应对此适当修正。合同意向书的性质应依据其内容是实体性条款还是程序性条款分别予以认定。

关 键 词:合意  意思自治  可归责性  信赖保护  镜像规则  意向书

On the Consensus and its Determination in Private Law
RAN Ke-ping.On the Consensus and its Determination in Private Law[J].Modern Law Science,2014,36(5):49-60.
Authors:RAN Ke-ping
Abstract:Consensus is consistent with the objective representation of the parties to explain the formation.When the content of representation led to controversy,additional attribution requirements should be added to the party who made the representation and the recipient party as a value basis for determining the consensus.The minimum standard for consensus should be the agreement between both parties which can be recognized by the law,the other terms can be filled by additional explanations and arbitrary norms. "Mirroring rules"cannot fully meet the needs of the transaction,which needs properly corrected. The nature of the contract should be identified based on its substantive provisions content of Intent or procedural provisions.
Keywords:consensual  private autonomy  attribution  reliance protection  mirroring rules  letter of intent
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号