物权法草案涉宪争议观点评述与思考

物权法草案调动了宪法学界和民法学界最主要的学术资源进行了一定的对话和讨论。在“违宪论”与“合宪论”之间,各自所持的理由很不相同。物权法草案最重要的争议是其中的涉宪争议,这一争议既暴露了部分民法学者宪法意识的淡薄,也暴露了部分宪法学者以“理想宪法”或“观念宪法”替代“现实宪法”的理论操作。涉宪争议的实质是民法的法治主义与宪法的宪政主义之争,法治与宪政的辩证关系还没有被学界充分厘清。

Comment and Reflection on Controversial Views as to Constitution-concerning Articles in Law of Things (Draft)

Law of things(draft) arouses comprehensive arguments and discussion among areas of constitution and civil law,where ideas of "violation of the constitution" and "compliance to the constitution" conflict violently with each other as to the articles of the law of things(draft).Among them dispute about constitution-concerning articles peaks,which reveals some civil jurists' vague awareness of constitution as well as some constitutional jurists' theoretical tendency of replacing "realistic constitution" with "ideal constitution" or "conceptional constitution".This problem is rooted in the dispute of rule of civil law or rule of constitution,and misunderstanding about the relationship between constitutionality and constitutionalism.