危险犯既遂后犯罪中止之否定及理论评介

关于危险犯的法定危险状态出现后,行为人积极消除法定危险的行为是否构成犯罪中止的问题,涉及危险犯既遂标准学说的反思和统一,意义重大。“肯定说”与“否定说”分别在解释学和立法学的立场上对此问题说明。“肯定说”试图改变危险犯的既遂标准的做法不仅未能自圆其说,反倒引发了理论矛盾,暴露出其缺乏平衡性思维、缺少体系性考虑和缺少必要的概念辨析的问题。既然承认危险犯是以法定危险状态的出现作为既遂标准,那么行为人消除危险状态的行为不应构成犯罪中止。

The Deny and Theoretical Review of the Discontinuation of the Crime after the Completion of the Dangerous Crime

After the appearance of the legal dangerous state of the dangerous crime,it is of great significance for the actor to actively eliminate the legal dangerous act to constitute the discontinuation of the crime.Affirmative theory is based on doctrinal argumentation,while negative theory is based on legislative argumentation.Affirmative theory not only failed to justify trying to change the criterion of accomplishment of the dangerous crime,but also caused theoretical contradictions.Behind the theoretical contradiction,exposing its lack of balanced thinking,systematic consideration and necessary concept discrimination in affirmative theory.Since the recognition of dangerous crime is based on the emergence of legal dangerous state as the completion standard,it is inevitable that the act of eliminating dangerous state can not be recognized as a crime suspension.