抢夺罪合理性质疑——以飞车抢夺为视角

我国刑法规定的抢夺罪存在着不利于实现刑法根本目的的有悖于法理的弊端，抢夺罪的存在模糊了与之密切相关的抢劫罪之间的界限，以致于在理论上和司法实践中对飞车抢夺犯罪行为性质的认定常常出现争议。本文认为抢劫罪与抢夺罪无论是在客体方面，还是在行为方式和犯罪的主观方面都无差异，都具有一致性，拆解抢夺罪可与刑法罪刑相适应原则相符，从而体现刑法在人权保障价值取向上的追求。

Question on the rationality of the crime of seizing——from the view of the motorist snatchings

The regulations about the crime of seizing in Chinese Criminal Law have some disadvantages which are not helpful to realize the actual aim of the Criminal Law and are against the jurisprudence.The existence of the crime of seizing mixes up the limits between it and the crime of robbery,which leads to some disputes about the natural of the motorist snatchings in practice and theory.No matter in object or in subject,there are consistency in the crime of seizing and crime of robbery.