| 宪法法官与法律比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 安乔内达&#;斯贝尔蒂[意],童德华.宪法法官与法律比较[J].湖北警官学院学报,2009,22(5):36-42. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 安乔内达&#;斯贝尔蒂[意] 童德华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]Ph.D of Law of Pisa University, Italy. [2]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 比较成为一种新的解释方法,是由于宪法法官在宪法裁决中援引他国先例。援引他国司法先例大体上包括美国模式、加拿大模式和南非模式。这三种模式触及到为国家的传统和人类共享的宪法价值和基本权利之间的关系,以及如何根据它们解释本国的宪法文本。在经济全球化进程中,宪法司法中的比较和对话是不可避免的潮流。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宪法法官 宪法解释 比较 基本权利 |
Constitution Judge and Legal Comparison |
| |
| Institution: | Tong Dehua (Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | As a result of constitution judge quoting precedents aboard in constitution adjudication,comparison be-comes a new means of interpretation.There exist three modes of quoting judicial precedents aboard: US Mode,Canada Mode and South Africa Mode.These three modes come down to the relationship between national traditions and shared human constitutional value and fundamental rights,and how to explain native constitution according to them.In the process of economic globalization,it is an unavoidable trend of comparison and communication in constitution jurisdiction. |
| |
| Keywords: | constitution judge constitution interpretation comparison fundamental rights |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
