论行政滥用职权司法审查的界限

《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》将滥用职权作为法院撤销被诉具体行政行为的法定理由，在行政权不断扩张的今天．该规定的内容使得司法权可以对行政主体的栽量活动进行审查，为防止行政权行使的肆意提供了司法保障。但是在我国当下的现实中，行政法学界对“滥用职权”的内涵与表现形式等基础理论研究存在较大争议，形成多种不同的观点，相对一致的学说理论没有形成；法律规定和司法解释也没有对“滥用职权”进行准确定位，进而导致在司法审判中，法官对“滥用职权”的标准难于把握，不能、不愿也不敢适用“滥用职权”而撤销具体行政行为。笔者试从“滥用职权”的不同认识出发，梳理之间存在的核心争议点，进而根据行政权与司法权之间的分权制衡，界定滥用职权司法审查的界限与深度．以期明晰在司法审查中法官需要把握的适用标准。

On Judicial Investigation of Administrative Abuse of Official Power

The administrative procedure law of the People＇s Republic of China has take abuse of official power as legal reason for court to abate the alleged specific administrative act which provides the judicial safeguard to prevent executive power from abusing. However, in practice, there still has not a comprehensive research or theory which undoubtedly make the judge difficult, unable and unwilling to apply ＂abuse of official power＂ to abate concrete administrative act. The article, from different aspects, defines the boundaries of judicial investigation of abuse so as to make clear the applied condition in investigation hereby.