首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论具体行政行为的合法性判断标准
引用本文:储湛.论具体行政行为的合法性判断标准[J].安徽警官职业学院学报,2006,5(4):42-43.
作者姓名:储湛
作者单位:安徽众城高昕律师事务所,安徽,合肥,230041
摘    要:我国行政诉讼法律制度没有区别不同类型的行政行为,没有根据不同行政行为中的行政机关担负的不同职责而分别设定不同的合法性判断标准,“尽责即合法、未尽责即违法”的判断模式既不能适应审判实践活动的需要,亦与社会活动的复杂性和政府职能转变不相协调,现行的行政诉讼法律制度确有必要进一步修订完善。

关 键 词:行政诉讼  具体行政行为  合法性判断标准
文章编号:1671-5101(2006)04-0042-02
收稿时间:2006-06-12
修稿时间:2006-06-12

Discuss the Legal Judge Standard of Concrete Administrative Bahavior
Chu Zhan.Discuss the Legal Judge Standard of Concrete Administrative Bahavior[J].Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers,2006,5(4):42-43.
Authors:Chu Zhan
Abstract:Our country's administrative procedure has not distinguished the variety of administrative action, and has not established the different legal judge standard according to the different responsibility that the administrative organ should takes in the different administrative action. "Fulfilling responsibility is legitimate, otherwise is illegally", this pattern of judge has already not been able to meet the need of trial practice, and cannot coordinate with the social activity's complexity and the shift of the government functions as well. Therefore, it's essential to consummate the present system of the administrative procedure.
Keywords:administrative procedure  concrete administrative behavior  legal judge standard
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号