首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

行政公益诉讼模式的选择
引用本文:汪良敏,陈黎.行政公益诉讼模式的选择[J].安徽警官职业学院学报,2004,3(5):56-58.
作者姓名:汪良敏  陈黎
作者单位:安徽大学,法学院,安徽,合肥,230039;安徽大学,法学院,安徽,合肥,230039
摘    要:当行政主体的行政行为对公共利益造成侵害或有侵害之虞时,法律应容许国家公诉机关或无直接利害关系的公民、法人或其他组织,为保护公共利益而向法院提起行政公益诉讼.这直接关系到公益保护的有效和行政权力监督的力度.在我国建立以行政公诉优先、民众诉讼为补充的行政公益诉讼模式,既能充分发挥检察机关在法律知识、办案经验,调查取证方面的优势,又动员了私权的力量来制约行政权的行使,从而构建监督行政权力的系统,促进行政权依法行使,从而维护公益.

关 键 词:公益诉讼  行政公诉  民众诉讼
文章编号:1671-5101(2004)05-0056-03

Choice of the Mode of Administrative Public Litigation
Wang Liangmin,Chen Li.Choice of the Mode of Administrative Public Litigation[J].Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers,2004,3(5):56-58.
Authors:Wang Liangmin  Chen Li
Abstract:When the action of subject of administrative damaged the public interest or has an intention to do it, it is permitted that, in order to protect public interest, the prosecuting unit, the non-interested party, artificial person or other organization can bring public litigation to the court. This is directly related to the protection of public interest and the supervision of administrative right. In our country, establishing the mode of administrative public litigation that gives priority to administrative public prosecution, and takes popular action as supplement, can not only make full use of the advantage of procuratorial organ, but also restrain the exercise of administrative right by using private power,. So the structure of administrative supervision is established, and this really improves the exercise of administrative right and protects the public interest.
Keywords:public litigation  administrative public prosecution  popular action
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号