首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法实践中故意伤害案件重复鉴定问题存在髓原因与对策
引用本文:李晓萍,史丽英.司法实践中故意伤害案件重复鉴定问题存在髓原因与对策[J].辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报,2011(2):23-24.
作者姓名:李晓萍  史丽英
作者单位:沈阳市和平区人民检察院,辽宁沈阳,110000
摘    要:司法实践中,成伤机制鉴定是故意伤害案件的主要定罪依据之一,在确定是否构成犯罪、罪责轻重等司法实务方面均起到重要作用,但在司法实务过程中,屡屡出现重复鉴定导致鉴定结论相互矛盾的情况。笔者从一名司法实践者的视角,结合具体案件的审查过程,对故意伤害案件中重复鉴定问题存在的原因进行了调研和分析,并尝试找到解决对策,提出建议,期望对今后这一问题能够得到重视并加以解决有所启发。

关 键 词:重复鉴定  原因  对策

Reasons for repeated identification of intentional injury cases in judicial practice and strategy
Li Xiaoping,Shi Liying.Reasons for repeated identification of intentional injury cases in judicial practice and strategy[J].Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice,2011(2):23-24.
Authors:Li Xiaoping  Shi Liying
Institution:Li Xiaoping,Shi Liying (Shenyang Municipal People's Procuratorate in Heping District,Shenyang Liaoning 110000,China)
Abstract:In judicial practice,the identification of injury mechanism is one of the main bases to convict intentional injury,and play an important role in determining whether it is a crime and the severity of blame,but in the process of judicial practice,repeated identification often led to the conflicting conclusions of the case.The author from the perspective of a judicial practitioner,with the review process of specific case,research and analyze the reasons for repeated identification in intentional injury cases,t...
Keywords:repeated identification  reason  strategy  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号