首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

形式法治与实质法治——兼论法治主义与宪政主义的区别
引用本文:秦强,王文娟.形式法治与实质法治——兼论法治主义与宪政主义的区别[J].甘肃理论学刊,2005(1):70-73.
作者姓名:秦强  王文娟
作者单位:山东大学,法学院,山东,济南,250100
摘    要:根据法治的价值内涵的不同,可以将法治分为形式法治与实质法治两大类.形式法治是分析实证主义法学传统的法治观念,认为法治就是法律之治;而实质法治则是价值法学传统的法治观念,认为法治必须是善法之治,必须以保障人权和自由为目的.在价值内涵上,实质法治和宪政主义的基本理念相契合,宪政主义构成了法治主义的价值本质.

关 键 词:形式法治  实质法治  宪政主义
文章编号:1003-4307(2005)01-0070-04
修稿时间:2004年12月20

The Formal Rule of Law and the Essential Rule of Law
Qin Qiang,WANG Wen-juan.The Formal Rule of Law and the Essential Rule of Law[J].Gansu Theory Research,2005(1):70-73.
Authors:Qin Qiang  WANG Wen-juan
Abstract:On the categories of rule of law, it can be divided into two parts, the formal rule of law and the essential rule of law in relation to the value. The formal rule of law is the idea of analytical jurisprudence, and the essential rule of law belongs to the natural law tradition, which holds that the rule of law must be the rule of good law, and must keep the aid to protect the human rights and liberties. In the valuable meaning, the essential rule of law corresponds to the constitutionism, and the constitutionism constructs the valuables nature of rule of law.
Keywords:the formal rule of law  the essential rule of law  constitutionism  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号