首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

印太视角下的“东盟中心地位”及美国-东盟关系挑战
引用本文:韦宗友.印太视角下的“东盟中心地位”及美国-东盟关系挑战[J].南洋问题研究,2019(3):1-11.
作者姓名:韦宗友
作者单位:复旦大学美国研究中心
基金项目:教育部人文社会重点研究基地重点项目“美国亚太联盟战略新动向及发展趋势研究”(15JJD810007)
摘    要:2019年6月,美国和东盟相继发布了印太战略和印太展望文件,描绘了各自对印太地区秩序的构想、愿景及利益主张。表面上看,美国的印太战略和东盟的印太展望都提出了"东盟中心地位"问题,两者似乎在这一问题上存在共识。但进一步分析显示,两者的"东盟中心地位"大异其趣,在出发点、关注点和实现目标的手段等方面,美国和东盟存在根本性不同。尽管美国和东盟在海上安全、能源与基础设施建设及数字和网络安全等领域存在合作空间,但是随着中美在印太地区博弈加深和美国主导地区秩序走向的意图日益凸显,美国与东盟关系将面临新的更大挑战。

关 键 词:印太战略  美国  东盟  “东盟中心地位”

ASEAN Centrality in the Indo-Pacific and the Challenges of U.S.-ASEAN Relations
WEI Zong-you.ASEAN Centrality in the Indo-Pacific and the Challenges of U.S.-ASEAN Relations[J].Southeast Asian Affairs,2019(3):1-11.
Authors:WEI Zong-you
Institution:(Center for American Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433)
Abstract:In June 2019, the United States and ASEAN published Indo-Pacific Strategy and ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific respectively, laying out their distinctive visions, objectives, and interests in the Indo-Pacific regional order. At first glance, both documents mentioned the "ASEAN Centrality", implying some common grounds between the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy and ASEN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. However, further analysis shows that there are great differences between the two apparently converging "ASEAN Centrality", in objectives, priorities, and means to achieve goals, among others. Needless to say, there is still room for cooperation in the areas of maritime security, infrastructure development, and digital and cyber security, the U.S.-ASEAN relations will face increasing challenges ahead as the competition between China and the U.S. deepens and the intentions of the United States to lead the regional order become increasingly prominent.
Keywords:Indo-Pacific strategy  the United States  ASEAN  ASEAN Centrality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号