| “假名文字论”与“满洲假名” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 洪仁善.“假名文字论”与“满洲假名”[J].外国问题研究,2011(4):11-16. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 洪仁善 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 青岛大学日语系 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“伪满历史文化与现代中日关系”(编号:10YJAGJW013)的阶段成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "假名文字论"是近代日本文字改革运动的产物,"满洲假名"是它的变异形式。在这一期间假名文字论者经历了从内到外的艰辛历程。但是战后假名文字论者最终还是退出了历史舞台,原因在于"假名文字论"始终未能得到日本国民的认可。
|
| 关 键 词： | 假名 “满洲假名” 近代 文字改革 |
Theory of Written Kana and Manchurian Kana |
| |
| Authors: | HONG Ren-shan |
| |
| Institution: | HONG Ren-shan(Department of Japanese,Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shangdong,266071) |
| |
| Abstract: | The theory of Written Kana was an output of reforming the writing system.Manchurian Kana was a writing language of variation.In the course of the Japanese Empire,the supporters of Written Kana,experiencing hardships from the interior to the colonies,stepped down from the stage of history at last,because the theory of Written Kana was not accepted by Japanese nations from the beginning to the end. |
| |
| Keywords: | Kana Manchurian Kana modern reform of the writing system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
