| 履行抗辩权探微 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔建远. 履行抗辩权探微[J]. 法学研究, 2007, 29(3): 45-58 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔建远 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国合同法将同时履行抗辩权和先履行抗辩权分立并无不当,不宜称合同法第66条的规定存在着法律漏洞。履行抗辩权在若干场合可以存在于非对价关系之中。履行抗辩权因当事人的约定而扩张或者收缩。对于同时履行抗辩权的"存在的效力",应当区分情况而定。
|
| 关 键 词： | 抗辩权 构成要件 行使效果说 存在效果说 |
Study on the Defenses in the Performance of Bilateral Contracts |
| |
| Cui Jianyuan. Study on the Defenses in the Performance of Bilateral Contracts[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2007, 29(3): 45-58 |
| |
| Authors: | Cui Jianyuan |
| |
| Abstract: | It is not a fault of Chinese Contract Law to separate defense of simultaneous performance and defense of subsequent performance,thus it is not proper to assert that there exists a legal gap in Article 66 of the Contract Law. Sometimes defenses in the performance of a contract may arise on the occasion that the duty undertaken by one party is not in exchange for the duty of the counterparty to perform. In addition, the defenses in the performance of the contract will be expanded or shrunk depending on the agreement of the parties. The effects of existence for the defense of simultaneous performance should be ascertained in different situations. |
| |
| Keywords: | defense constitutive requirements doctrine of alleging effects doctrine of existing effects |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
