| 司法证明模糊论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 栗峥. 司法证明模糊论[J]. 法学研究, 2007, 29(5): 49-65 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 栗峥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “真实”本身具有多元解释,是一个不可能得到精确认定的模糊概念。“事实”必须为法官所确立,是一种个性思维过程后的结论,可称为“法官真实”。从模糊理论与心证演变模式的三个阶段的视角看,自由心证的实质是模糊心证。司法证明必须容忍甚至鼓励富有极大模糊性的日常生活语言以描绘案件事实。模糊理论为司法证明科学的发展带来了新的视角与方法,扩展了研究者理性选择的空间,做出了不同于既有法学语境的诠释,试图形成一个能够科学描述和处理司法证明模糊性的概念体系和方法论框架,以突破摇摆于确定性与不确定性之间的困惑。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法证明 法官真实 模糊心证 信念修正 |
A Theory of Fuzziness on Judicial Proof |
| |
| Li Zheng. A Theory of Fuzziness on Judicial Proof[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2007, 29(5): 49-65 |
| |
| Authors: | Li Zheng |
| |
| Abstract: | "Truth" is a vague concept rich of meanings which rejects accurate understanding."Fact" must be established by judges as a conclusion after individualized thinking, which can be called "judge truth".From the views of fuzziness and a three-stage evolution model, the evaluation of evidence is essentially fuzzy. Judicial proof should tolerate and even encourage the using of fuzzy language in daily life to describe cases. The theory of fuzziness provides new perspective and methods for the scientific development of judicial proof, and it also creates and expands the rational choice space for researchers. It gives explanations differently from existing legal context, and tries to form the concept system and methodology frame to describe and deal with the fuzziness of judicial proof scientifically. Thus it offers an approach to resolve the difficulties between certainty and uncertainty. |
| |
| Keywords: | judicial proof judge truth fuzzy evaluation of evidence belief revision |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
