| 占有改定与善意取得 兼论民法规范漏洞的填补 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 税兵. 占有改定与善意取得 兼论民法规范漏洞的填补[J]. 法学研究, 2009, 0(5): 3-17 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 税兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学法学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 占有改定和善意取得的关系,考验着法律人的抽象思维能力和具体情形中符合事理的判断力,需要运用成文法解释模式进行法律论证。在物权法的意义脉络中,立法文本所表述的交付概念从未涵括占有改定。作为法律拟制产物的占有改定,其物权变动效果不等同于现实交付,与善意取得之间具有不相容性。占有改定的物权合意只能在传来取得的情形中产生效力,在善意取得的情形中则不生效力。为填补规范漏洞,物权法第106条所言交付应作目的论限缩解释,以免法律激励出坏的交易风险,有悖于此条款追求交易安全的价值取向。
|
| 关 键 词： | 占有改定 善意取得 物权变动 目的论限缩 成文法解释模式 |
Constructive Delivery and Good Faith Acquisition |
| |
| Shui Bing. Constructive Delivery and Good Faith Acquisition[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2009, 0(5): 3-17 |
| |
| Authors: | Shui Bing |
| |
| Abstract: | The relationship between constructive delivery and good faith acquisition is a puzzle which should be argued according to the mode of statute law interpretation, thus challenges scholars' ability of abstraction and reasonable judgment. Where a thing alienated by way of constructive delivery does not belong to the alienor, can the acquirer in good faith become the owner? No answer can be found directly in Chinese Property Law, so the analysis has to proceed in semantic, systematic and teleological approach. ... |
| |
| Keywords: | constructive delivery good faith acquisition transfer of the ownership of a movable restrictive interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
