论我国银行业的协作型竞争——加入WTO后我国银行业竞争理念的转变

本文从一案例入手 ,引出我国银行业竞争理念需要改变 ,应符合当今协作型竞争的潮流。然后 ,从理论和实践两方面分析论证协作型竞争的缘由。最后 ,提出了我国银行业协作型竞争的简单构想     

马克思哲学与古典政治经济学:一种后现代的挑战 --鲍德里亚《生产之镜》解读

鲍德里亚在其<生产之镜>中对马克思与古典政治经济学的内在关系进行了讨论.鲍德里亚认为,虽然马克思批判了古典政治经济学,但马克思哲学的基础仍然是古典政治经济学的生产逻辑,这种逻辑并不能说明现代资本主义社会,即符号支配一切的社会.在<生产之镜>中,鲍德里亚的主题就是要走出这种生产式的社会批判理论,以符号与文化批判替代政治经济学批判.鲍德里亚的这一分析,实质上是一种理论的乌托邦.     

关于竞争、协调、中庸、矛盾的再认识

上世纪六七十年代的中国,"矛盾"、"斗争"是出现频率很高的词汇。当时不能讲"竞争","中庸之道"受到批判。在今天和平与发展的时代有必要对竞争与协调、矛盾与平衡、偏激与中庸等关系重新研究、重新认识。建国50多年来,关于竞争理论的研究可分为五个阶段;"竞争"有必要重新下定义;竞争具有两面性。竞争与协调是对立统一关系;协调在竞争中有积极的作用。"中庸"是一种思想,既无贬义,又无褒义;协调的思想根源在于中庸之道;领导者应从中庸思想中得到启迪;"矛盾",可以表达为逻辑概念和哲学概念。过去,矛盾理论被泛化、被曲解、被政治化;矛盾诸方面的斗争性被绝对化,而同一性被淡化了;矛盾的斗争性与同一性同时存在,巧妙运用,才能取得较好的效果。时代要求协调和"双赢";中国需要协调和"双赢";领导者在协调中实现"双赢"。     

人力资本投资理论的几个假定及投资风险的理论实证

现代社会是一个风险社会,人力资本投资也不例外。但就人力资本投资理论而言,其基本前提是"零风险"假定,内含同质性、完全竞争和信息完备等基本假定,这在真实世界中是不成立的。论文基于理论视角对人力资本投资理论隐含的几个基本假定进行分析,认为人力资本投资对象的特性决定其是异质性的,人力资本投资主体和客体不完全竞争和信息不完备是其基本外部条件,人力资本的外部性是风险来源的必然逻辑。     

美国潜在竞争理论中两种主要类型分析

作为最早创立反垄断法律制度的国家,美国在其反垄断立法与司法实践中逐渐形成了一系列规制企业混合合并的理论,主要有互惠交易理论、构筑防御设施理论和潜在竞争理论。目前仅有潜在竞争理论仍然适用,该理论已成为规制混合合并的主流理论。这一理论由两部分构成:现存的潜在竞争理论和被察觉的潜在竞争理论。     

论竞争环境对人才成长的影响

竞争环境是指两个或两个以上的主体在特定的规则或机制下,为达到各方共同的目的而作的较量,并产生各主体获取不同需求的对象而由非物质条件以及无形条件之和构筑而成的氛围。在现代社会,它具有独有的特征,这些特征对人才成长会产生深刻的影响。深入研究人才与竞争环境的相互影响,正确揭示竞争环境作用的科学规律和机制,能为人才成长指引航标,更好地推动人才与竞争环境的协调发展。     

试论基于员工能力的组织竞争优势建设

基于资源的理论表明员工能力对企业获得竞争优势具有重要意义。本文在分析员工能力和组织竞争优势的特点及两者间关系的基础上，从开发和培训员工能力的角度，探讨了提升组织竞争优势的可行性．并进一步论述了有关实施策略。     

对新兴古典经济学与传统贸易理论的比较研究

当今,古典经济学已被赋予新的内涵,古老的经济思想和现代数学模型的有机结合使斯密用分工来解释国际贸易理论的论述发展为新兴古典贸易理论,堪称为贸易理论领域的一次革命。本文旨在将新兴古典贸易理论与传统贸易理论进行比较,并做出评价。     

古典管理理论与行为科学理论的比较分析

古典管理理论与行为科学理论作为西方管理思想史上两大重要理论流派分别从不同的视角研究了管理的基本问题。从比较的层面看,行为科学理论对古典管理理论实现了研究方法的转换,即经验性研究转向实证性研究、客体性研究转向主体性研究、局部性研究转向系统性研究、静态性研究向动态性研究转换;同时,行为科学理论对古典管理理论也实现研究内容的超越,即人性研究的超越、管理原则的超越、组织视阈的超越、决策模式的超越。从比较视阈对古典管理理论与行为科学理论进行研究,对于现代管理理论发展与实践操作具有重要的意义。     

企业竞争新方式--合作竞争

随着市场经济的发展,企业竞争出现了一种新方式,即合作竞争.合作竞争有三个显著特点高层次的竞争;全方位的竞争;双赢的竞争.     

结构主义和后结构主义化的批判理论--让·鲍德里亚的消费社会理论

鲍德里亚虽主要以一套仿象、内爆、超现实的理论闻名于世,但其真正基础却是他在成为明星学者之前提出的一套社会理论。鲍氏社会理论实为一种结构主义和后结构主义化的另类批判理论。它属于批判理论,因为它像法兰克福学派的批判理论一样,立足于以彻底否定的态度分析当代西方社会;它不同于法兰克福学派的地方在于它先后采用结构主义和后结构主义作为基本分析武器。在马克思主义阶段,鲍氏用结构主义把现代社会界定为符号化社会,即由等级性差异系统支配的社会。在后马克思主义阶段,鲍氏用后结构主义进一步把现代社会分为确定性阶段和不确定性阶段,强调资本主义最新阶段的特点是“能指的解放”、“能指的游戏”。     

Renaturalisierung sozialer Ungleichheiten? Zu Wolfgang Kerstings vergeblicher Hoffnung, auf dem Weg von John Rawls über Robert Nozick zu einer liberalen Sozialstaatsphilosophie zu gelangen

In 2000, Wolfgang Kersting gave a much acknowledged outline concerning a liberal welfare state-philosophy within the debate on libertarianism and egalitarianism. Kersting, who used to sympathize with John Rawls’ theory of justice, now bases his approach on a ‘naturalism of merits’, which he polemically distinguishes from all egalitarian forms of political liberalism. This article deals with Kersting’s way from John Rawls’ ‘Theory of Justice’ (1971) via Robert Nozick’s ‘Anarchy, State, and Utopia’ (1974) to his present conception of a minimal welfare state; furthermore, the article points out that Kersting’s conception is appropriate neither to the complexity of modern societies nor to the basic normative standards of the classical political liberalism.     

塞尔言语行为理论探析

语言哲学是现代西方哲学的一个重要分支。美国当代哲学家塞尔的“言语行为理论”在英美分析哲学界有一定的影响。他强调从使用和交际的角度研究语言的意义,强调把语言当作人类行为的一部分进行研究,强调对语旨行为的结构、类型及其标准进行分析,从而打破了传统的静态研究语言的模式,为现代语言哲学的发展作出了一定的贡献。对其理论进行剖析,有助于我们对语言现象及其本质的理解。     

THE FLOATING VOTE

MR. BLANCHARD ON THE KREMLIN AND THE VATICAN
W. H. MORRIS-JONES
London School of Economics and Political Science
THE TEACHING OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
K. C. WHEARE
All Souls College, Oxford
THE LIMITATIONS OF POLITICAL THEORY'
A Comment on Professor Rees's Article
PETER G. LUCAS
University of Manchester
THE TEACHING OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
C. A. W. MANNING
London School of Economics and Political Science
THE POLITICAL STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
NOTES AND NEWS     

基于图书馆员继续教育问题的思考——以中共陕西省委党校图书馆为例

现代社会是人才竞争的社会,谁拥有高素质人才,谁就会立于不败之地。以陕西省委图书馆员的继续教育为例,对图书馆员继续教育问题的现状、遵循原则和具体实施要领做了简要阐述。     

产销一体化经营模式成因探究

人类社会的发展过程中,竞争是一直伴随其左右并不断使其向前发展的源泉与动力。在现代社会中,尤其是从20世纪90年代以来,我国国内很多企业、集团纷纷采取了产销一体化的经营模式。这种模式的采用,究其原因,就是行业内的竞争所致。在现代工业化社会分工越来越细致,商业资本从产业资本中分离出来,在商品经济不发达的社会,由于生产规模有限,单个商品生产者生产的商品不多,那时,产销统一由生产者自己完成。商品经济发展到一定阶段后,随着生产规模的扩大,单个产业资本家生产的商品越来越多,他便不能同时兼顾生产与销售。因此,产销一体化的经营模式应运而生。     

Milton's Case for a Free Commonwealth

This article will examine the development of John Milton's arguments for democracy as against monarchy and other sorts of autocratic rule. These arguments are interesting both in their own right and insofar as they shed light on historiographical debates concerning the classical republican tradition. Milton is shown to hold a negative conception of liberty, as opposed to a positive or participatory conception, which lends support to the neo-roman interpretation of that tradition, associated with Quentin Skinner and Philip Pettit. However, it is further shown that Sinner and Pettit misunderstand the classical republicans' case for democracy, attributing to them a conceptual argument in place of an empirical one. A better understanding of Milton's political theory contributes to a better understanding of this dilemma, and perhaps suggests a solution.     

How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory

Saliency theory is among the most influential accounts of party competition, not least in providing the theoretical framework for the Comparative Manifesto Project – one of the most widely used data collections in comparative politics. Despite its prominence, not all empirical implications of the saliency theory of party competition have yet been systematically tested. This article addresses five predictions of saliency theory, the central claim of which is that parties compete by selective issue emphasis rather than by direct confrontation. Since a fair test of the theory's assumptions needs to rely on data that measures party issue saliency and party positions independently, this article draws on new manifesto data from the Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES). Analysing all manifestos issued for the 2002, 2006 and 2008 general elections, it shows that saliency theory correctly identifies some features of party competition. For instance, parties disproportionally emphasise issues they ‘own’. Yet, the core assumption of saliency theory that parties compete via selective issue emphasis rather than direct confrontation over the same issues fails to materialise in the majority of cases.     

Theodor Adorno,Alterglobalization, and Non-identity Politics

While the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School has become an interesting player in recent theoretical attempts to understand the problems of, and potential solutions to, capitalist regimes of globalization, it has been generally limited to the work of Jürgen Habermas and his followers. As seen in the recent work of David Held and Nancy Fraser, Habermas's notion of the ideal of the public sphere and his conception of deliberative democracy have provided tantalizing tools for rethinking the importance of global civil institutions and spaces in furthering, to draw upon terms from Fraser's work, both recognition and redistribution on a global level. What has been less relevant in this resuscitation of Critical Theory in things global has been the work of the first-generation Frankfurt School theorists. In particular, the importance that Theodor Adorno's theory may have in articulating and characterizing the character of alterglobalization movements is explored. Adorno's notion of negative dialectics is first looked to in order to uncover a conception of radical politics, and then the recent attempt by John Holloway to bring in Adorno for the global anti-capitalist movement is explored. It is argued that while Holloway draws upon relevant and important aspects of Adorno's thinking, he does so by reinforcing some of the more problematic elements in Adorno's theory. Finally, Ernesto Laclau's characterization of political struggle is brought in to fully flesh out a non-identity politics implied in Adorno's work.