Recombinant DNA research: actions under the guidelines--NIH. Notice of actions under NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules

This notice sets forth actions taken by the Director, National Institute of Allergy and infectious Diseases (NIAID), by authority of the Director. NIH, under the June 1983 NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (48 FR 24556).     

Office of Recombinant DNA Activities; recombinant DNA research: action under the guidelines. National Institutes of Health (NIH), PHS, DHHS. Notice of action under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines)

This notice sets forth an action to be taken by the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (59 FR 34496, amended 59 FR 40170, 60 FR 20762, 61 FR 1482, 61 FR 10004, 62 FR 4782, 62 FR 53335, 62 FR 56196, 62 FR 59032, 63 FR 8052, 63 FR 26018).     

陆家豪非"独立董事"及其责任承担的质疑--全国首例"花瓶董事"状告证监会案引发的法律思考

全国首例“花瓶董事”陆家豪状告证监会案已经落下帷幕。围绕陆家豪是“独立董事”还是“董事”及其责任承担,笔者看法是:法院判决陆为“独立董事”是不合法的;认定陆的责任承担上是过重的。     

Judicial use of social science research

American courts use social science research in three distinct ways: to make law, to determine facts, and to provide context. In this article, we review and critique the approaches that courts have traditionally taken to dealing with each form of social research. We also summarize and integrate a body of work offering a different perspective that treats law-making research associal authority, fact-finding research associal fact, and context-providing research associal framework. We end by proposing a coherent sequence of steps that courts should take when confronted with an empirical question about human behavior.This article was prepared under the auspices of the Task Force on Judicial and Regulatory Decisionmaking of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government. The views expressed are those of the authors rather than of the Task Force or the Commission. We are grateful to David Z. Beckler, Associate Director, for his comments. Requests for reprints should be sent to either author at the School of Law, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22901.