冷战后中、日与东盟的关系

在冷战结束后,中国—东盟从没有正式外交关系迅速发展到20世纪90年代末的紧密交流与合作,而日本—东盟政治关系则缺乏前进的动力。早在1977年,日本就与东盟建立了对话伙伴关系,并通过工业、科技、文化、贸易、投资等领域的各种合作项目,开始与东盟建构多层次的对话与合作机制。     

日、韩探索农村建设新思路

社会主义新农村是我国现代化进程中的重大历史任务,建设"生产发展、生活宽裕、乡风文明、村容整洁、管理民主"的社会主义新农村,内容丰富,涵义深刻,任务艰巨.     

东盟与中国的关系

东南亚国家联盟(Association of South-East Asian Nations ASEAN以下简称东盟)是东南亚地区发展中国家的区域性组织,现已发展成为维护地区和乎与稳定、促进地区经济合作与共同发展的重要力量。 东盟与中国的关系,是亚太地区国际关系的重要组织部分。特别是在冷战后的今天,东盟同中国政治经济关系的迅速发展与加深,将直接影响亚太地区乃至世界的和平、稳定与繁荣。     

东盟与大国关系评析

冷战后,尤其是在亚洲金融风暴和“9·11”事件之后,中美日等大国在东南亚的存在与影响发生了很大的变化。面对这种变化,东盟各国认为,单纯依靠东盟自身的力量是无法保障本地区安全的,而大国出于利益的驱动和对权力的追求,一定会在东南亚地区进行扩张和竞争,利用这些大国之间的相互竞争,可以达到某种均衡的态势,从而保证本地区的安全、稳定与繁荣。在东盟各国看来,中国在东南亚地区的影响力正处于上升的态势,是一个个雄心勃勃的地区强国,而美国则是一个“温和的超级大国”,因此,有必要扩大美国和日本在该地区的存在与影响力,以制衡中国。     

台湾与东盟经济关系发展新趋势、成因与前景分析

近几年来台湾与东盟经济关系呈现出一些新的发展趋势,主要表现为台湾对东盟投资额和双方贸易额快速增长,东盟在台湾对外经贸格局中的地位不断攀升以及双方经贸交流合作日益密切,其中台湾与新加坡率先签订“经济伙伴协议”,标志着台湾与东盟国家的经济关系迈入新的发展阶段。双方经济关系的快速发展是东盟经济的“引力”、大陆经济转型升级的“推力”、两岸关系和平发展和台湾当局政策“助力”这三股力量共同作用的结果。未来台湾与东盟经贸往来有望继续保持平稳发展态势,东盟对台湾经济重要性将持续上升,台湾也将东盟及主要国家列为对外商签VrA的重点对象,但可预见的是,双方经济关系将继续在“一个中国”框架内运行,且不会从根本上影响两岸经济关系发展大局。     

日印韩“非洲公关战”

非洲对日印韩加大与自己的经贸联系均持肯定和欢迎的态度,因为这能使非洲摆脱仅仅作为国际竞标物的尴尬,而能利用新加入战团的日印韩的杠杆作用,打破由法美中"第一梯队"和英德俄"第二梯队"竞逐非洲的旧格局,从而渐进告别所谓的新殖民主义。     

北方政策和南北韩关系

一、北方政策和北韩政策的联系韩国的北方政策和北韩政策之间有不可分离的联系。这是因为我们所追求的最终目的是为了使中国、苏联以及东欧诸国影响北韩,防止战争,维持和平,促进民族的共同繁荣。虽然两者之间有明显的联系,但是在联系这一概念上两者之间缺乏协调的国家战略     

中国-东盟关系渐入佳境

自1967年东盟成立以来,中国同东盟关系经历了曲折复杂但总体向前的发展过程.受冷战、意识形态、社会制度及文化、厉史、宗教等方面因素的影响,彼此一度相互猜疑、对立,后来逐渐和解、合作,直到建立和逐步深化战略合作伙伴关系.     

中、日、韩国家关系的现状和发展前景

东北亚是目前蓬勃发展的亚洲经济的重心,中日韩三国又是东北亚的重要大国,三国关系的发展对于亚洲乃至世界的和平与发展具有十分重要的意义。本文旨在分析中日韩三国国家关系的现状及其成因,并在此基础上探讨其发展前景。     

从肯尼亚日非峰会看日本对非关系的调整

正肯尼亚日非峰会是近年来日本调整对非关系的集中体现。日本对非关系调整的核心是赶超近年来同中非关系竞争的落后局面,并最终赢得非洲国家在国际上对日本利益的支持。然而,由于日本队非政策调整存在被动性、功利性和局限性等特点,从而制约了日非关系深化。2016年8月27—28日在肯尼亚召开的第六届东京非洲发展国际会议(TICAD-VI,简称肯尼亚峰会)是日本继中国与非洲的中非合作论坛约翰内斯堡峰会后日本对非关系调整的重要举措。日本对非合作的赶超战     

ASEAN and evolving power relations in East Asia: strategies and constraints

This article seeks to examine constraints and challenges that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) states are confronted with in formulating and implementing their strategies in response to evolving regional environments represented by the rise of China. It argues that China's southern neighbours have adopted purposeful strategies in order to mitigate potentially negative effects from China's growing capabilities in East Asia. These strategies led to the expansion of membership in the East Asia Summit (EAS) and positive involvement in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, encouraging America's substantial commitments to the Asia-Pacific. However, ASEAN has failed to form the unified front on the EAS and TPP because its members have adopted diverse stances on and policies towards the two institutions. Moreover, an identity issue constitutes a crucial impediment to promoting cooperation between ASEAN members and the USA. While Washington has intensified diplomatic linkages with ASEAN, the US identity shown in its adherence to the results-oriented approach still provokes some concerns among the ASEAN members.     

Reforming government with information technology in South Korea

The South Korean government recently launched 11 major e‐government services after a long period of inter‐ and intra‐ministry politics concerning the allocation of jurisdiction over various e‐government services. This article analyses the politics of e‐government efforts in South Korea. It begins by describing the development of e‐government policy in South Korea for the past two decades, and identifies its four major features as comprehensiveness, fragmentation, the orientation toward operational efficiency and citizen services, and the inclination toward new technological solutions. The article concludes that these features can be attributed to the heavy involvement of the macro political system, its high susceptibility to inputs from experts, and the institutional design of the informatisation subsystem.     

Impact evaluations in South Korea and China

While evidence-based policy-making is increasingly in demand, as new policies are required to bring effective results to targeted groups in South Korea and China, few studies have investigated the progress of quantitative impact evaluation that focuses on causality. This paper studies the trends of quantitative impact evaluation of public policy in South Korea and China by surveying major public administration and public policy journals in these two countries from 2000 to 2015. Among published articles in the major journals, our study pool includes research articles directly related to quantitative impact evaluation. Our study found that there has been considerable progress in impact evaluation research in South Korea and China in both data quality and empirical methods. However, empirical impact evaluation still comprises a small fraction (only one to two percent) of all research in public administration and public policy in both countries. We also found limited discussion on the selection mechanism and related bias in South Korea even in recent years, while causality and selection bias have been more commonly discussed in China. Also, advanced empirical methods are more frequently observed in journal articles in China than those in South Korea.     

Social integration and suicide in South Korea

The increasing suicide rate in South Korea in recent decades was found to be associated with measures of social integration/regulation (birth and divorce rates).     

南奥塞梯局势与俄格关系

最近,格鲁吉亚与地方政权南奥塞梯之间的冲突一度升温.7月6日,格军警拦截并扣留了向俄驻南奥地区维和部队运输武器物资的俄军车辆;教小时后,俄和南奥维和部队还以颜色,在当地扣留了格军维和部队指挥官凯巴兹上校及与其同行的格军维和士兵;7月7日,南奥武装人员解除了该地区一格族人居住村内50名格维和士兵武装;7月8日,格政府军与南奥武装在利阿赫夫斯基峡谷发生冲突,造成2名格士兵受伤,1人被俘.