法医 DNA 实验室外源性污染15例

PCR 具有高灵敏度，可扩增微量 DNA，但如果不采取正确的防护措施，其高灵敏度同样会带来麻烦[1]。本研究通过对本鉴定中心 DNA 实验室发生的15例法医 DNA 外源性污染进行分析，强调 DNA 提取、包装、送检务必要按规范操作，尽量避免人为污染。一旦发生污染，要有能力及时发现，避免给办案造成更大的问题。     

一核酸清洁剂在法医DNA实验室防污染上的应用

法医DNA实验室污染是导致鉴定结论错误的重要因素,DNA实验室应加强实验室管理,重点防范实验室的DNA污染,并解决污染问题。一核酸清洁剂由A、B两种组分构成,两种组分配合使用能破坏DNA结构,防止DNA在PCR中的复制。该核酸清洁剂能有效防范DNA实验室的污染,并解决实验室的污染问题,能很好的应用于法医DNA实验室质量监控管理。本文通过实验对比分析,阐明了该核酸清洁剂的作用效果。     

澳大利亚联邦警察局法医DNA实验室管理与质量控制简介

在国家留学基金委资助下，笔者于2011年作为国家公派访问学者赴澳大利亚联邦警察局（Austral—ianFederalPolice，简称AFP）法医及数据中心（Fo—rensicandDataCentre）交流学习。本文重点介绍最新的澳大利亚联邦警察局法医DNA实验室管理的基本情况及其目前质量控制（QualityControl，简称QC）的主要措施，结合我国的实际国情及法医DNA实验室管理及发展现状，探讨我国可以借鉴的法医DNA实验室管理制度、运行机制、质量管理等方面先进经验，供同行们借鉴和参考。     

法医DNA实验室污染问题分析与对策

法医物证学;DNA污染;防控措施     

法庭科学DNA实验室规范化建设的初体验

近几年来,法庭科学DNA分析技术及其数据库建设在国内发展迅速,各类刑事案件的侦破及法庭举证中该技术的应用日趋广泛。各地法医DNA实验室检验量持续增加,专业技术人员长期超负荷工作,鉴定质量难以保障,已成为普遍面临的问题。因此,尽快开展法庭科学DNA实验室的规范化建设显得尤为重要。现将本实验室开展规范化建设情况及工作中的体会介绍如下,供同行交流、参考。1天津市法医DNA实验室规范化建设情况本实验室自1990年组建以来,历经RFLP、VN-TR、STR等法医DNA分析技术各个发展时期的磨砺,逐步走上了标准化、规范化的发展轨道。针对…     

环氧乙烷消杀DNA污染效果初探

目的初探环氧乙烷消杀DNA污染的效果。方法收集98例分别含有唾液、皮屑、汗斑、毛发、血斑、肋软骨的法医物证样本,分两组进行环氧乙烷灭菌6h和8h,提取DNA后扩增,使用3130XL或3500XL测序仪检测进行STR分型。结果 EO 6h组44例样本中有2例口腔拭子检出阳性结果,EO 8h组54例样本中有1例毛发检出阳性结果,阳性样本STR图谱表明仅有少量DNA残留,其余生物样本未检测到STR图谱。结论环氧乙烷能有效消杀DNA污染,可适用于DNA检验耗材的灭菌。     

用于DNA提取的磁性纳米技术

磁性纳米技术用于DNA提取具有许多优势,如提取纯化一步完成、DNA定量提取、DNA提取自动化等,在法医DNA检验领域具有广阔的开发前景。本文就其主要的优点和技术方法作一简要综述。     

国产法医DNA检验试剂耗材检测DNA标准品的准确性研究

目的利用法医DNA标准品对自主研发的法医DNA检验试剂耗材进行电泳检测准确性的实验考查。方法实验平台分为2个：平台1全部由美国AppliedBiosystems公司进口的3130xl遗传分析仪、16道电泳毛细管与甲酰胺、电泳缓冲液、凝胶构成;平台2由AppliedBiosystems公司进口的3130xl遗传分析仪、16道电泳毛细管与本实验室研发的甲酰胺、电泳缓冲液、凝胶构成。在实验平台上对allelicladder、内标等标准品以及阳性对照9947a的STR复合扩增产物进行电泳检测,利用GeneMapper软件对电泳结果进行分析。结果自主研发的法医DNA检验试剂耗材可与国外进口的3130xl遗传分析仪配套使用,构建的实验平台对法医DNA标准品的检测结果准确无误。结论自主研发的甲酰胺、电泳缓冲液、凝胶等法医DNA检验试剂耗材检测准确性达到了国外同类产品水平。     

接触DNA检验成功率的影响因素探讨

人在接触物体后,会在物体表面留下少量的接触DNA,对它的检验是目前法医DNA检验的热点和难点。在不同情况下,接触DNA的STR检验成功率差异较大。影响接触DNA检验成功率的主要因素有个体差异、载体属性、接触时间、遗留时间、检验时能否突出重点部位、检验策略的选取和结果分析等,本文详细综述了接触DNA检验成功率的影响因素。     

移液器使用不当导致DNA分型Ladder污染原因初探

在法医DNA分型检验中,如出现与等位基因标准对照物（Ladder）一样的等位基因,应注意Ladder污染[1]。本文对由于移液器使用不当,造成其头部或管道内壁DNA蓄积而导致Ladder污染原因进行分析,希望为相关检验提供借鉴。1材料与方法1.1样本 收集本实验室扩增区生物安全柜内5支日常使用的移液器（量程分别为200μL、100μL、20μL、10μL和2μL）,分别用超纯水清洗,取其清洗液为样本（共5份）,取用日常使用的移液器分装的PowerPlex 18D System试剂盒（简称PP18D）内的扩增混合物、引物和试剂盒内扩增用超纯水为样本（共3份）,以上共计8份样本为待测DNA模板。     

Automated DNA extraction using the QIAsymphony platform: Estimation of DNA recovery from simulated forensic stains

The aim of this study was to evaluate the forensic protocol recently developed by Qiagen for the QIAsymphony automated DNA extraction platform. Samples containing low amounts of DNA were specifically considered, since they represent the majority of samples processed in our laboratory. The analysis of simulated blood and saliva traces showed that the highest DNA yields were obtained with the maximal elution volume available for the forensic protocol, that is 200 μl. Resulting DNA extracts were too diluted for successful DNA profiling and required a concentration. This additional step is time consuming and potentially increases inversion and contamination risks. The 200 μl DNA extracts were concentrated to 25 μl, and the DNA recovery estimated with real-time PCR as well as with the percentage of SGM Plus alleles detected. Results using our manual protocol, based on the QIAamp DNA mini kit, and the automated protocol were comparable. Further tests will be conducted to determine more precisely DNA recovery, contamination risk and PCR inhibitors removal, once a definitive procedure, allowing the concentration of DNA extracts from low yield samples, will be available for the QIAsymphony.     

Report of the blind trial of the Cetus Amplitype HLA DQ alpha forensic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) amplification and typing kit

The AmpliType HLA DQ alpha forensic DNA amplification and typing kit is designed for the qualitative analysis of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ alpha alleles present in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from forensic samples. The AmpliType kit is the first forensic DNA typing product based on the GeneAmp polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process. The kit was evaluated by five forensic science laboratories (test sites) to assess their ability to perform DNA typing using PCR on sample types typically encountered by forensic laboratories. None of the DNA-containing samples was mistyped. Of the 180 DNA-containing samples analyzed, results were reported for 178 (98.9%). Of the 178 samples with results, all were correctly typed. Two sites did not report a result for one sample each. Four of the five laboratories experienced no significant levels of contamination in the DNA-containing samples. At the one site with the highest number of DNA-containing samples with contamination, the typing results were not compromised. This site was able to correct the contamination problem through simple procedural changes and stricter attention to sterile technique. Blank controls were important to monitor contamination. In conclusion, the trial demonstrated that forensic science laboratories are capable of setting up a PCR-based DNA typing laboratory and successfully using the AmpliType HLA DQ alpha forensic DNA amplification and typing kit to analyze forensic samples.     

The application of ultraviolet irradiation to exogenous sources of DNA in plasticware and water for the amplification of low copy number DNA

Using high sensitivity forensic STR polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing procedures, we have found low concentrations of DNA contamination in plasticware and water assumed to be sterile, which is not detected by standard DNA procedures. One technique commonly used to eliminate the presence of DNA is ultraviolet (UV) irradiation; we optimized such a protocol used in the treatment of water, tubes, plates, and tips for low copy number DNA (LCN) amplification. UV light from a Stratalinker((R)) 2400 was administered to 0.2, 1.5 mL tubes, and PCR plates contaminated with up to 500 pg of DNA. They were subsequently quantified with an ALU-based real-time PCR method using the Rotorgene 3000. Overall, there was a decrease in concentration of DNA recovered as the duration of treatment increased. Nonetheless, following 45 min of irradiating a PCR plate with 500 pg of DNA, nearly 6 pg were still detected. However, when the plate was raised within an inch of the UV source, less than 0.2 pg of DNA was detected. Additionally, lining the area around the samples with aluminum foil further reduced the amount of time necessary for irradiation, as only 30 min eliminated the presence DNA in the raised PCR plate. Similar experiments were conducted using tubes filled with a solution of DNA and water in equivalent concentrations for 50, 15, and 1.5 mL tubes with comparative results. It is plausible that the aluminum foil increased the amount of reflection in the area thereby enhancing penetration of UV rays through the walls of the plasticware. This protocol was tested for the possibility of inhibitors produced from irradiation of plastic tubes. As our protocols require less irradiation time than previous studies, PCR sensitivity was not affected. Moreover, the lifespan of the UV lamps was extended. Our findings demonstrate that this method is useful as an additional precautionary measure to prevent amplification of extraneous DNA from plasticware and water without compromising the sensitivity of LCN DNA amplifications.     

Field Contamination of Skeletonized Human Remains with Exogenous DNA

The Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory reports the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences of over 800 skeletal samples a year for the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command–Central Identification Laboratory. These sequences are generated from degraded skeletal remains that are presumed to belong to U.S. service members missing from past military conflicts. In the laboratory, it is possible to control for contamination of remains; however, in the field, it can be difficult to prevent modern DNA from being transferred to skeletal elements and being carried forward through the analysis process. Four such cases are described here along with the controls in place in the laboratory to eliminate the possibility of the exogenous DNA being reported as authentic. In each case, the controls implemented by the laboratories prevented the false reporting of contaminant exogenous DNA from remains that were either faunal or human, but lacked endogenous DNA.     

应用自动化工作站提取常见生物样本DNA

目的建立使用自动化工作站提取法医案件生物样本DNA的方法。方法选用Biomek 3000自动化工作站,采用DNA IQTM系统及Chelex法对法医案件中常见生物样本进行DNA提取,荧光定量技术进行定量,PCR扩增16个STR基因座并与手工提取方法比较。结果与手工提取方法进行比较,选用自动化工作站结合使用DNAIQTM系统及Chelex法提取DNA可获得满意的STR检验结果。结论自动化工作站可用于法医案件中常见生物样本的DNA提取。     

法医物证DNA自动化检验技术体系的研究

目的建立自动化工作站同步提取不同种类涉案法医生物检材DNA的新方法。方法选用TECAN Freedom EVO100．4、75—2型自动化提取、加样工作站,采用磁珠法及Chelex-100法对各类涉案生物检材进行DNA提取、PCR扩增、毛细管电泳检测其STR分型,进行比较测试。在“全国公安机关DNA数据库应用系统”中建立并应用实验室信息管理系统（LIMS）模拟实施规范化DNA检案。结果1552份各类检材,采用工作站-磁珠法提取DNA效果最佳,STR检测成功率为95％,工作站-Chelex法为88％;二者分别与其手工提取法比较,成功率无明显差异。92个样本同期检测,自动化工作站较手工操作DNA检案时间可缩减1．25倍。结论工作站域珠法提取涉案检材DNA,可获得满意的STR分型结果。应用LIMS管控,可有效防控污染,明显提高检案效率及鉴定质量。     

脱落毛发线粒体DNA HV1区序列测定的研究

目的　对脱落毛发线粒体DNAHV1区序列测定方法进行研究。方法　嵌合扩增结合末端荧光标记DNA测序。结果　对 2 0例脱落毛发进行分析获得了明确的测序结果 ,与来自同一个体的血液所测得的DNA序列进行比较 ,完全相同。结论　嵌合扩增在对脱落毛发进行线粒体DNA多变区序列分析中是一种有效的方法 ,在法医DNA检验中具有实用价值。     

High‐Resolution Melting (HRM) of Hypervariable Mitochondrial DNA Regions for Forensic Science

Forensic strategies commonly are proceeding by analysis of short tandem repeats (STRs); however, new additional strategies have been proposed for forensic science. Thus, this article standardized the high‐resolution melting (HRM) of DNA for forensic analyzes. For HRM, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from eight individuals were extracted from mucosa swabs by DNAzol reagent, samples were amplified by PCR and submitted to HRM analysis to identify differences in hypervariable (HV) regions I and II. To confirm HRM, all PCR products were DNA sequencing. The data suggest that is possible discriminate DNA from different samples by HRM curves. Also, uncommon dual‐dissociation was identified in a single PCR product, increasing HRM analyzes by evaluation of melting peaks. Thus, HRM is accurate and useful to screening small differences in HVI and HVII regions from mtDNA and increase the efficiency of laboratory routines based on forensic genetics.     

Simplified low-copy-number DNA analysis by post-PCR purification

Frequently, evidentiary items contain an insufficient quantity of DNA to obtain complete or even partial DNA profiles using standard forensic gentotyping techniques. Such low-copy-number (LCN) samples are usually subjected to increased amplification cylces to obtain genetic data. In this study, a 28-cycle polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to evaluate various methods of post-PCR purification for their effects on the sensitivity of fluorophore-based allelic detection subsequent to capillary electrophoretic separation. The amplified product was purified using filtration, silica gel membrane, and enzyme mediated hydrolysis purification techniques and evaluated for their effect on fluorescent allelic signal intensity. A purification method was selected and its effect on fluorescent allelic signal intensity was compared with that of the unpurified PCR product. A method of post-PCR purification is described which increases the sensitivity of standard 28-cycle PCR such that profiles from LCN DNA templates (<100 pg DNA) can be obtained. Full DNA profiles were consistently obtained with as little as 20 pg template DNA without increased cycle number. In mock case type samples with dermal ridge fingerprints, genetic profiles were obtained by amplification with 28 cycles followed by post-PCR purification whereas no profiles were obtained without purification of the PCR product. Allele dropout, increased stutter, and sporadic contamination typical of LCN analysis were observed; however, no contamination was observed in negative amplification controls. Post-PCR purification of the PCR product can increase the sensitivity of capillary electrophoresis to such an extent that DNA profiles can be obtained from <100 pg of DNA using 28-cycle amplification.     

Analytical Thresholds and Sensitivity: Establishing RFU Thresholds for Forensic DNA Analysis,

Determining appropriate analytical thresholds (ATs) for forensic DNA analysis is critical to maximize allele detection. In this study, six methods to determine ATs for forensic DNA purposes were examined and compared. Four of the methods rely on analysis of the baseline noise of a number of negatives, while two utilize the relationship between relative fluorescence unit signal and DNA input in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) derived from a dilution series ranging from 1 to 0.06 ng. Results showed that when a substantial mass of DNA (i.e., >1 ng) was amplified, the baseline noise increased, suggesting the application of an AT derived from negatives should only be applied to samples with low levels of DNA. Further, the number and intensity of these noise peaks increased with increasing injection times, indicating that to maximize the ability to detect alleles, ATs should be validated for each post‐PCR procedure employed.