论我国知识产权融资保险制度之建构——从保险法角度切入

鉴于国家知识产权战略以及类似于"温州债务危机"的中小企业融资难困境,未来《保险法》的修订应该考虑知识产权融资保险,尤其是知识产权融资履约保证险和信用险、知识产权价值评估险等制度的运用,以缓解银行因融资风险过大而"惜贷"的现象。     

知识产权融资不对称性的法经济学分析

知识产权融资是解决知识产权主导型的创新型企业资金短缺瓶颈的可行选择.与实物资产抵押融资相比,我国知识产权质押融资存在着供给与需求、融资能力、融资风险与收益等不对称性问题.法经济学理论及原理,提供了解决此不对称性问题的思路.通过质押融资特性研究,阐明知识产权质押融资不对称性的内容和法经济学解释;通过融资约束分析,揭示知识产权质押融资中的法律影响.     

我国中小型高新技术企业知识产权融资体系探析

根据企业生命周期理论,经营和财务风险、权益融资与负责融资应该反向搭配。知识产权融资体系由知识产权权益融资和负债融资组成。当前,我国正在进行全方位的社会转型,市场经济不完善、资本市场不发达、知识产权保护尚不严格,建立一种与我国国情相适应、与中小型高新技术企业发展周期相协调、可操作性强、动态的知识产权融资体系是政府和企业的最优选择。     

我国知识产权质押融资面临的困境、挑战及对策

我国目前开展的知识产权融资业务实践中存在的困境主要体现为知识产权质押融资中的高风险和高成本,引导风险投资联动是拓展知识产权质押融资、化解风险的有效渠道。在借鉴国外有关经验的基础上,有必要构建一种角色科学定位、风险多方承担的新模式,从科学定位政府角色、构建科学合理的风险补偿与分担机制、创新担保方式等方面有效化解。     

知识产权质押融资的风险分解与分步控制

在转变经济发展方式、建设创新型国家的进程中,创新型中小企业发挥着不可或缺的重要作用.但是,资金短缺问题一直困扰着中小企业,成为制约其规模经营和持续发展的瓶颈.将专利等知识产权作为质押物,获得银行放贷的知识产权质押贷款,为中小企业提供了融资发展的新途径.在其运行过程中,风险的有效控制就显得极为重要.探讨和研究质押融资中各种风险的控制方式和方法,对于在更大范围内和更深层面推进面向中小企业的知识产权质押融资具有重要的参考价值和现实意义.     

发展权视域下农业知识产权融资探析

发展权是农业知识产权融资的理论基础。长期以来我国立法重视生存权而不重视发展权,造成了农村金融的诸多问题,农业知识产权融资发展举步维艰。农业知识产权融资应当以融资主体的利益正当性为基点,构建科技创新机制、风险防控机制、惠益分享机制和私权自治保障机制,在策略选择上完成从重视生存权向重视发展权的理念嬗变,培育农业知识产权融资专业评估机构,并强调农业科技创新与农业知识产权融资的双轨并行。     

新加坡:迈向“亚洲知识产权枢纽”

四月初,在新加坡律政部召开的记者会上,新加坡律政部兼教育部高级政务部长英兰妮宣布,新加坡政府采纳知识产权指导委员会就新加坡发展为"亚洲知识产权枢纽"的10年总蓝图和相关建议,作为建议的内容之一,最近将推出一项融资计划,推动企业向银行借贷时将知识产权质押作为融资方式。政府提供的支持,是为金融机构分担此类贷款的风险,并将由知识产权局来设立"知识产权估价卓越中     

国家政策:为打造创新"乐土"提供支撑

知识产权质押融资是指知识产权权利人将其合法拥有的、目前仍有效的专利权、注册商标权、著作权等知识产权出质,从银行等金融机构取得资金,并按期偿还资金本息的一种融资方式.     

知识产权质押贷款风险分散机制研究

知识产权质押融资是知识产权市场化的重要途径,也是促进金融产品创新,应对金融危机的一个突破口.我国近几年来,央行、国家知识产权局等部门都通过不同的途径和措施来推动该业务的发展,也开展了相应的试点工作.但由于知识产权质押涉及因素十分复杂,推广缓慢.其中知识产权质押融资过高的风险和由高风险产生的高交易成本是制约发展的主要瓶颈.我国应该建立知识产权质押融资国家担保制度来有效分散风险,促进知识产权质押融资活动的有效健康发展.     

银行在按揭贷款中的风险及法律对策

目前我国房地产业的融资渠道主要是银行，个人住房抵押贷款即按揭贷款是银行对房地产业资金支持的主要形式之一，银行按揭贷款封房地产业发展的重要意义不言而喻。由于银行按揭贷款涉及三方以上的当事人，法律关系复杂、资金量较大、期限较长，其中所涉及的金融风险可想而知，本文分析了银行在按揭贷款中的主要风险，并提出了相应的对策，对银行等金融机构防范其中的金融风险具有参考价值．     

流浪乞讨与管制--从贫困救助看中央与地方权限的界定

随着《收容遣送办法》的废止,个人自由权利与社会治安秩序之间的现实冲突比过去更为突显。应转变中央和地方关系的传统思维,在允许地方更多自主权和选择权的同时,更充分地保障公民个人的宪法基本权利。无论是中央和地方关系的法律界定,还是公民权利的宪法保障,都要求建立独立的司法机构以审查地方立法的有效性。     

Implementing and evaluating crime prevention and control programs and policies

The history of crime prevention and control efforts in the United States has demonstrated little progressive improvement in our ability to deter crime. The major obstacles to implementing effective interventions and policies have been a weak scientific knowledge base about how to prevent crime, the research community's inability to effectively disseminate what is known about the causes of crime and to translate this knowledge into operational programs and policies, and a resistance on the part of practitioners and policy makers to evaluate programs and policies and to use this information in the development of new programs and policies. In the last decade, there have been major advances in our understanding about the causes of crime and we have now demonstrated the effectiveness of selected prevention programs. But there is little evidence that this scientific knowledge is informing current practice or policy. Problems in the dissemination of this information and the resistance to utilizing it remain. These problems are discussed and suggestions are made for addressing them. Our knowledge base remains modest, but it is now sufficient to inform policy and practice. The research community must work to do a better job of disseminating this information and overcoming the resistance to utilizing it before we will be successful in implementing effective crime prevention programs and policies. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

International aid,trade and investment and access and allocation

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics - The access to goods and their allocation (who gets what, when, where and how) is one of the analytical problems of the 2009...     

Accommodation and Satisfaction: Women and Men Lawyers and the Balance of Work and Family

This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principal responsibilities for the care of children, but it also finds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.     

真相与正义，探究与辩护，科学与法律

在美国法律文化塑造下的对抗制诉讼制度和科学的调查程序之间存在着紧张关系（tension），在法律所关注的裁决终局性（finality）和科学所追求的持续性纠错（oven—minded fallibilism）之间存在着紧张关系。长期以来，法律界都试图通过可采性法律规则归化科学证言，结果导致联邦法官担负起广泛的审查职责；近期，法庭指定专家的制度实践导致对抗制度做出某些修正，这种制度实践已经被批评为“带有纠问色彩”（inquisitorial），甚至“违背了民主的要求”（undemocratic）。在分析这些制度利弊的过程中，我们有必要考察其他法律系统的经验教训。     

油气储运防火安全分析及预防措施

本文主要从设备故障与维护、防静电、动火作业、执行操作规程等几个方面引起的爆炸和火灾进行分析,制定对应的防护措施。提出了以做好设备维护保养、防静电处理、做好防火设计及安全装置、落实动火作业措施及强化安全培训等方面进行综合防控,消除油气储运过程中引起的爆炸和火灾,以实现安全生产。     

Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law

Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems.