应对公共危机与挑战 构建面向未来的领导力

对于领导力的理论探索、实证研究和有关领导力发展的实践尝试,已成为世界各国关注的热点和焦点。随着政府面临的挑战日益严峻和复杂,新形势对于公共部门领导力发展也提出了新的要求和任务。公共部门未来领导力的研究重点与核心关注是:领导力与公共政策的互动,领导力的多样性和性别平等,领导力在专业主义与管理主义间的平衡。公共部门面向未来领导力构建的新思路是:应对公共危机,建设风险领导力;后公共管理时代,发展治理领导力;网络媒体社会下,培养信息媒体领导力;重建公共信任,塑造伦理领导力。     

道学思维与领导力研究

目前,领导力研究领域出现理论无法整合的状况是西方实证主义研究方法的必然结果.解决这一问题必须跳出西方式的思维.中华古老的道学思想具有极强的综合思辩性,可以弥补西方以逻辑、数理和实验实证方法研究社会科学带来的不足.     

公共服务:是"顾客主权"还是"公民主权"

本文探讨了西方新公共管理运动顾客服务理念的矛盾性。顾客服务在私营部门仅仅是赢得顾客的一种手段 ,而非真正为顾客服务。当它被借用到公共部门 ,就会遭遇到一系列操作性和政治性挑战 ,如公共部门的顾客界定、公共部门顾客界定、公共部门顾客服务的标准、政治公平、公民偏好、代理责任等问题。如果说私人服务是“顾客主权” ,那么 ,公共服务应该是“公民主权”。     

论新公共管理运动对公共部门绩效评估的影响

20世纪80年代在西方兴起的“新公共管理”运动对公共部门绩效评估的理论与实践都产生了深远的影响。本文立足于分析新公共管理运动背景下公共部门绩效评估的发展历程,在此基础上探讨了新公共管理运动对公共部门绩效评估产生的影响,并进一步分析了新公共管理运动对我国公共部门绩效评估的借鉴意义。     

公共部门协同创新研究的进展与展望——基于SSCI顶级期刊文献的系统性综述

随着公共与社会问题的复杂性和不确定性加剧,公共治理棘手问题大量出现,协同创新日益成为公共部门重要的治理策略。本文基于2011—2021年公共管理领域SSCI顶级期刊上发表的文献,对公共部门协同创新的内涵与特点、公共部门协同创新的实践领域、公共部门协同创新的影响因素、推动协同创新中的政府职能与角色定位、公共部门协同创新的绩效等问题进行综述,分析已有研究存在的不足,并提出未来研究方向,即:应加强对协同创新模式治理绩效的研究,并对不同协同创新模式的适用场景、在不同场景下的不同协同创新模式的效果、如何优化创新模式组合等问题开展研究,还应注重多元研究方法的使用,深化中国情境下公共部门协同创新的研究探讨,以增进研究的广度与信度。     

公共部门与私人部门人力资源管理的异同分析

公共部门对工商业界人力资源管理理念的借鉴性引入形成了公共部门人力资源管理,因此公共部门人力资源管理和企业人力资源管理之间存在着许多的共性。另一方面,公共部门和私人部门是两个异质性的领域,公共部门人力资源管理逐渐发展出了不同于企业人力资源管理的一些特征。作为公共部门的改革者,要积极解放思想,本着充分利用人才、增进社会公共利益的原则引导改革。     

非营利组织的持续性发展与领导力培育

面对激烈的市场竞争与变化,非营利部门的发展已经从“快速扩张”走向“理性收缩”。健康、稳定、持续成了该领域在新的历史时期的发展目标。为了实现这一目标,我们应该加强非营利组织领导力的培育和发展工作。本文在分析领导力之于非营利组织持续性发展的关键作用,及非营利组织现行管理体制对其发展制约的基础上,针对性地提出了改善非营利组织领导力培育和发展的对策与建议。     

美国公共部门绩效评估的实践及启示

20世纪70年代后,公共部门的绩效评估活动在西方发达国家蓬勃开展。了解美国公共部门绩效评估的一些实践情况,结合我国公共部门绩效评估中的不足,可以从中引出一些有益的启示,推动我国公共部门绩效评估走向制度化、科学化和规范化。     

国家廉政体系理论视野下的中国廉政建设研究

自20世纪90年代以来,透明国际提出的国家廉政体系理论经过不断发展,已经成为西方社会用于防范与阻止腐败的主流理论工具,被广泛运用于社会科学领域和政策研究领域。而廉政建设是建党以来长期坚持的重要工作,尤其是党的十八大以来,一系列强有力的反腐行动在我国开展。根据透明国际提出的国家廉政体系理论,提出我国形成惩治和预防腐败的制度体系新路径:构建完善的反腐败法律体系;结合政府、公共部门、非政府组织三方进行共同治理;扩大公民参与路径;扩大信息公开;发挥审计机关的作用;强化新闻媒体的监督权;创造公平竞争的市场环境。     

大学生领导力培养现状分析及对策思考——以广州9所高校为例

本研究采用问卷调查法,调查了广州9所高校大学生领导力培养的现状。从大学生对领导力培养的认识、对领导力特质的认识与自我评估、对领导力培养的渠道与途径的认识、影响领导力培养的环境因素、领导力培养的实践情况等五大方面进行研究分析,发现并总结归纳现存问题,在此基础上提出相应的对策建议。     

Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers,or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence About Innovative Public Managers

One element of the debate over New Public Management concerns public-sector entrepreneurship. Critics see entrepreneurs as people prone to rule breaking, self-promotion, and unwarranted risk taking, while proponents view them as exercising leadership and taking astute initiatives. This article examines two samples of the best applications to the Ford Foundation—Kennedy School of Government innovation awards, one between 1990 and 1994 and the other between 1995 and 1998, to see whether they are more consistent with the critics' or proponents' views. The second sample closely replicates the first, and the evidence from both strongly supports the proponents' views. Innovators are creatively solving public-sector problems and are usually proactive in that they deal with problems before they escalate to crises. They use appropriate organizational channels to build support for their ideas. They take their opponents seriously and attempt to win support for their ideas through persuasion or accommodation.     

„Politische Führung“ als politikwissenschaftliches Problem

‘Political leadership’ is one of the classic subjects of political science research on an international scale. Recently, in modern western democracies, ‘leadership’ has gained additional importance as a political function to evaluate governments and political leaders and is seen as rather independent of the policy dimension of leadership. Despite this increased relevance of ‘political leadership’, it has remained among the most neglected major issues in political science, particularly within research in the German-speaking world. This article discusses a wide range of recent approaches to studying ‘political leadership’. It then argues in favour of an ‘interactionist’ approach which takes into account both of the crucial empirical variables which influence the leadership process, the institutional, societal, and personal factors as well as political circumstances, and the normative expectations towards political leadership in modern established democracies.     

What's in a Sector? The Shifting Career Plans of Public Policy Students

Recent decades have seen a trend in which public policy graduates shun government and enter private-sector employment. In part, the shift reflects changing sectoral opportunities, but its magnitude and consistency are puzzling—even troubling—in light of the need for public-sector talent. Data from a two-year series of surveys and interviews with policy students reveal that many begin their training with uncertain career goals and ambivalence about public-sector work. Interest in government declines from entry to graduation, and it appears that the policy curriculum—heavy on analytic methods and conveying cautions about policy making—does little to promote a public-sector orientation. Those planning to enter government are strongly motivated by a desire to have an impact, whereas those drawn to the private sector seek financial resources and professional development. Many anticipate fluid careers and choose positions expected to offer growth, a feature more commonly associated with private than public jobs.     

Evaluation in and of Public-sector Reform: The Case of Denmark in a Nordic Perspective

The purpose of this article is to shed light on the twinned development of public-sector reforms and evaluation in Denmark. While there is a substantial literature on both public-sector reforms and on evaluation, focus has only recently been put on the relations between these phenomena. The case of Denmark has, however, not been included in the international comparison. This article therefore discusses the case of Denmark, comparing it briefly to Finland, Norway and Sweden. The article analyses both 'evaluation in' and 'evaluation of' public-sector reform. 'Evaluation in' refers to the question to what extent evaluation (in line with other elements such as, e.g. privatization and performance management) has been part of the content of reforms. 'Evaluation of' refers to the questions of whether and how reforms themselves have been evaluated. The analysis shows that although the rhetoric of reforms have been similar in the Nordic countries, reform actions and especially the twinned development of reforms and evaluation have differed between the countries.     

领导理论刍议

本文从解析领导的概念入手,分析了领导的本质,阐述了领导与管理的区别,介绍了领导理论研究发展的脉络,探讨了当前领导学研究中存在争议的问题,从而启发一个领导者应该做什么。     

Collective Leadership and Context in Public Administration: Bridging Public Leadership Research and Leadership Studies

This article challenges the view that public leadership research should maintain a separate perspective in the study of public leadership. It discusses the benefits of further embedding the public leadership research domain within leadership studies, constructing a cross‐fertilization that contributes to advance both. The article maps key concerns in relational leadership theories, contrasting them with current work in the public leadership research domain and offering suggestions to close the gap. It highlights public leadership scholarship's competitive advantage to contribute to theorizing about leadership, given the importance of context for building contemporary theories of relational leadership.     

西方领导研究百年回顾与展望

本文回顾了在西方领导研究的百年历史中涌现出的影响深远的重要理论成果,然后在此基础上概括出领导研究的范式及理论框架,提出了领导学研究中存在的重要问题,并展望了其未来的发展方向.     

Overcoming resistance to resistance in public administration: Resistance strategies of marginalized publics in citizen‐state interactions

There has been a general resistance to resistance studies in public administration (PA) research. Although previous research has documented instances of selective policy implementation by PA practitioners that put minority groups at a comparative disadvantage, we still have a limited understanding of the different ways in which these groups contest discriminatory administrative practices especially within non‐western developing countries. To address this gap, in this article, I discuss the various strategic responses the Khawaja Sira—a genderqueer group of Pakistan—employ in their interactions with the frontline police workers to contest their hyper‐surveillance and moral policing. The discussion illustrates that while Khawaja Sira mostly rely on individual acts of contestation in their interactions with police officers, the emerging leadership of the Khawaja Sira is enabling emergence of new forms of resistance based on social capital and collective protests. In addition to contributing to the limited literature on citizen perspectives and LGBT issues in PA research, the theoretical framework of resistance presented here can serve as a good template to analyze citizen responses to discriminatory frontline practice in other sociopolitical contexts as well.     

Managerial perceptions of leadership and management in an African public service organization

This article describes and analyses data on perceptions of leadership and management, generated by a study of managerial behaviour, organizational functioning and performance in the Ministry of Local Government, Lands and Housing (MLGLH) in Botswana. The study was commissioned by the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida). The findings indicate that the managers in the investigation did not generally recognize the distinction between organizational leadership and management that is postulated in the predominant current western view. The perceived ideal leader who emerges from the investigation is kindly and supportive and provides clear directions; the western ideal of the ‘corporate hero’ did not emerge from the findings. Further, the Tswana managers emphasize the reaction of the boss as a major factor in judging their own performance. This finding of the acceptance of hierarchical authority and accompanying dependency supports evidence from the few empirical studies undertaken previously in Africa, and has implications for the current plan to implant elements of the ‘Singaporean model’ in Botswana.