技术创新人才保护的法律制度创新

技术创新的重要性已得到共识,但是技术不会自己创新,而是依靠科技人才的一系列创造性活动来实现。因此,技术创新不能只限于对创新的保障条件、环境和制度的研究,应当重视对创新主体的研究。技术创新也应当以人为本,只有保护创新人才,才能实现技术创新。对技术创新人才的政策法律制度的创新,是技术创新得以实现的必要环境。     

浅析绿色技术的专利制度

生态文明的建设要以科技为支撑,以法律制度加以保障。生态化法律是生态文明建设的一部分,知识产权生态化也是社会发展的趋势。绿色技术创新顺应了建设生态文明的发展潮流。绿化专利制度有利于优化创新的环境,实现绿色创新常态化,推动我国可持续发展。专利制度为绿色技术保驾护航,平衡经济发展与生态建设,以实现经济与生态双赢。     

和谐社会背景下的企业管理创新探析

国有农业企业应进行经营理念创新、制度创新和管理技术创新,从经营土地转向经营人力、技术、资金等方面,创造性地发展新产业,才能使公司上档次、上水平,实现和谐发展。     

试论我国企业技术创新文化环境的构建

文化因素渗透于所有技术创新活动中,决定着创新个性,直接关系到技术创新的成败。构建良好的技术创新文化环境,为技术创新活动提供了有力的支撑,对于我国企业创新能力的提高具有重大的现实意义。本文首先着眼于我国企业内部文化环境的建设,重点论述了企业创新文化建设和制度文化支撑两个方面,最后,对企业外部参与创新的社会部门应该为企业创新文化环境的构建提供哪些方面的支持进行了阐述。     

企业技术创新与实施知识产权战略的法律运行机制研究（下）

国家知识产权战略是我国近几年来提出和推动的国家战略实施形式,而技术创新战略要求确立企业为技术创新主体的战略思想。加强企业技术创新能力建设是一个综合性的系统工程,涉及企业外部创新环境、支持条件和内部创新资源和能力的整合,而知识产权战略实施是企业实现技术创新的重要保障。技术创新与实施知识产权战略具有密切的互动关系,技术创新成为知识产权战略的重要目标,而知识产权战略对企业培育自主创新能力具有重要的推进作用。总体上,需要建立企业技术创新与知识产权战略融合的法律运行机制。     

企业技术创新与实施知识产权战略的法律运行机制研究（上）

国家知识产权战略是我国近几年来提出和推动的国家战略实施形式,而技术创新战略要求确立企业为技术创新主体的战略思想。加强企业技术创新能力建设是一个综合性的系统工程,涉及企业外部创新环境、支持条件和内部创新资源和能力的整合,而知识产权战略实施是企业实现技术创新的重要保障。技术创新与实施知识产权战略具有密切的互动关系,技术创新成为知识产权战略的重要目标,而知识产权战略对企业培育自主创新能力具有重要的推进作用。总体上,需要建立企业技术创新与知识产权战略融合的法律运行机制。     

令人震惊的“佳能革命”

“佳能革命”是以制度创新为本,并带来了产品和技术创新的崭新生产方式。它所获得的成功,是制度创新的成功,也是制度创新带动的产品创新和技术创新的成功     

管理的实质在于创新

本文从管理创新的动因入手,以技术创新、组织创新、制度创新等为切入口,全部阐述了管理的实质就在于创新的观点     

知识产权制度与技术创新之内在联系研究——以两者内在协同机制、模仿和知识产权保护强度为考察视角

知识产权制度与技术创新之间具有十分密切的关系.企业技术创新成果的价值需要通过知识产权制度来实现,知识产权作用于技术创新全过程.技术创新是知识产权的源泉,技术创新过程体现了知识产权的产生、运用和保护的过程.模仿、知识产权保护强度与技术创新之间具有密切关系.知识产权保护强度对发展中国家技术创新、自主创新也具有重要影响.     

新型工业化与制度创新初探

实现新型工业化是我国现代化进程中艰巨的历史任务,不仅需要结构创新、技术创新,更需要制度创新。制度创新是一个带有根本性、全局性、稳定性和长期性的问题,它决定了工业化道路的选择。经典学者对制度创新与经济发展的关系作出了精辟的论述,认为在市场经济中,制度至关重要。国外工业化进程中制度创新的实证经验,为我国走新型工业化道路提供了启示和借鉴。我国要实现新型工业化,必须选择制度创新的正确战略,通盘考虑,重塑制度,构建中国特色新型工业化的制度体系,从制度上为实现新型工业化铺平道路。     

民营企业财产继承法律问题研究

为保障民营企业的整体和可持续发展,处理好财产继承问题至关重要,否则会引发风险和带来危机.民营企业目前主要存在产权不清晰、不完备、缺乏创新,不同类型的民营企业与实现财产继承权及其他权利存在不衔接、不配套等问题,现行继承法及相关制度不健全、不完善等诸多法律难题.对此,研究并提出改革与完善产权制度,建构与完善现行继承法律制度与企业法律制度及其相互衔接的构想和建议,则具有现实性、重要性和紧迫性.     

Making Sense of COMPSTAT: A Theory-Based Analysis of Organizational Change in Three Police Departments

COMPSTAT, the latest innovation in American policing, has been widely heralded as a management and technological system whose elements work together to transform police organizations radically. Skeptical observers suggest that COMPSTAT merely reinforces existing structures and practices. However, in trying to assess how much COMPSTAT has altered police organizations, research has failed to provide a broader theoretical basis for explaining how COMPSTAT operates and for understanding the implications of this reform. This article compares two different perspectives on organizations—technical/rational and institutional—to COMPSTAT's adoption and operation in three municipal police departments. Based on fieldwork, our analysis suggests that relative to technical considerations for changing each organization to improve its effectiveness, all three sites adopted COMPSTAT in response to strong institutional pressures to appear progressive and successful. Furthermore, institutional theory better explained the nature of the changes we observed under COMPSTAT than the technical/rational model. The greatest collective emphasis was on those COMPSTAT elements that were most likely to confer legitimacy, and on implementing them in ways that would minimize disruption to existing organizational routines. COMPSTAT was less successful when trying to provide a basis for rigorously assessing organizational performance, and when trying to change those structures and routines widely accepted as being "appropriate." We posit that it will take profound changes in the technical and institutional environments of American police agencies for police departments to restructure in the ways anticipated by a technically efficient COMPSTAT.     

Innovation capacity in the healthcare sector and historical anchors: examples from the UK,Switzerland and the US

Innovation is an integral part of economic development in developed economies. In the post 2008 period, a key policy agenda is that of sustainable development, which calls for innovation in all aspects of value-chains. In this paper, we focus on innovation from the biotech—pharma perspective to see whether or not this will lead to a sustainable future for the regions where there are clusters of firms in this sector. We examine data from a recently completed European Union study of innovation in the Healthcare sector from the UK and Switzerland, countries with an historical base in pharma, to understand how innovation pathways vary at the regional level in the broader life sciences, which incorporate biotech and more. Innovation in the healthcare sector in two regions, Oxfordshire in the UK and Zurich in Switzerland are compared. We contextualize our discussion by drawing on studies that focus on the sector in the US, specifically Boston. The analytical framework comprises three elements: innovation systems and national and regional economic development theories are the first two, followed by approaches which consider organizational or institutional activity. This framework is used to help explain and understand the complexity of how innovation is organized at the sub-national level. The overall context is that it is increasing becoming a condition for government financing of research that it has more immediate application in industry or have the possibility of commercialisation (e.g., translational research).     

技术创新导向下民营企业的知识产权问题研究——以浙江省为例

随着经济的知识化与全球化,企业竞争的核心已围绕着技术创新展开。民营企业进一步生存和发展的根本出路在于通过技术创新拥有和行使知识产权。本文通过对＂正泰诉施奈德＂案例的思考,分析了知识产权对民营企业技术创新的价值,知识产权与技术创新的结合,探讨了技术创新导向下民营企业如何制定和应用知识产权战略,分析了浙江省地方立法对民营企业技术创新的知识产权保护措施。     

论技术创新生态化的法律制度安排

技术创新生态化有保护生态环境和促进经济发展的双重使命 ,是技术创新的方向。本文在论述技术创新生态化概念的基础上 ,提出并比较详细地论述了保障和促进技术创新生态化的四种法律制度安排即政府推动制度、市场拉动制度、公众参与制度和国际合作制度。     

高新技术产业发展与循环经济法律制度的构建

高新技术与循环经济结合的机制来看,高新技术开发及其产业化是循环经济形成和发展的基础,而循环经济立法中可持续消费引导制度、扶持科技创新制度、生态工业园区制度的设计又为高新技术产业的有序发展提供了法律保障。     

欧洲联盟体制内的发展权

20世纪80年代以来国际社会所关注的发展权问题其关键意义不在于理论创新,而在于实践指导。社会的公正与协调、持续发展在很大程度上取决于较为贫困、经济欠发达的地区和人口的生活程度。欧洲联盟通过一系列外部和内部政策为这一领域的实践提供了可资参考的范例。在这方面,中国可以结合自身的情况,分析其可以借鉴的方面,为促进发展权而做出贡献。     

浅论提升吉林省科技创新能力

党的十八大报告指出：科技创新是提高社会生产力和综合国力的战略支撑,必须摆在国家发展全局的核心位置.同样,提高科技创新能力也是促进区域经济可持续发展的重要动力源泉.目前,吉林省正处经济转型发展的关键时期,因此,加大政府对科技创新的支持力度、充分发挥企业自主创新的主体作用、建立产学研合作体系等是提升吉林省科技创新能力的重要途径.     

Product innovation and process innovation in SOEs: evidence from the Chinese transition

This paper offers an analysis of the influence of management behavior on the relationship between factors such as market, governance and resources of a firm, and the choice of the type of technological innovation in Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The authors develop a structural equation model and 12 hypotheses and test the model and hypotheses using a sample of 274 SOEs in China. This study discovers that the choice of innovation types among Chinese SOEs depends on the turbulence in the environment, and on the organizational resources. The key contributions of the study include: testing existing theories of innovation in the context of Chinese SOEs; studying the factors that affect product innovation and process innovation in that context; and demonstrating that market forces and internal governance simultaneously influence SOE innovation.     

Structured uncertainty: a pilot study on innovation in China’s mobile phone handset industry

This paper explains why many small and medium-sized (SME) private high-technology Chinese manufacturing firms survive and thrive within an institutional and political system arrayed against them. We use the mobile phone handset industry as an illustrative case of the vitality and capabilities of Chinese SMEs. We argue that in capitalizing on the advantages offered by the global fragmentation of production, while also being constrained by an institutional climate of structured uncertainty, Chinese non-state firms have chosen a pattern of incremental innovation in their search for competitive advantage. Despite falling outside central government innovation plans and engaging in practices inimical to nurturing novel product innovation capabilities, these firms have a sustainable business model based on niche tailoring, rapid product introduction and utilization of standardized components.