Developmental validation of RSID™-Semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen

Abstract: Tests for the identification of semen commonly involve the microscopic visualization of spermatozoa or assays for the presence of seminal markers such as acid phosphatase (AP) or prostate‐specific antigen (PSA). Here, we describe the rapid stain identification kit for the identification of semen (RSID?‐Semen), a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test that uses two antihuman semenogelin monoclonal antibodies to detect the presence of semenogelin. The RSID?‐Semen strip is specific for human semen, detecting <2.5 nL of semen, and does not cross‐react with other human or nonhuman tissues tested. RSID?‐Semen is more sensitive with certain forensic evidence samples containing mixtures of vaginal secretions and semen than either of the commercially available PSA‐based forensic semen detection tests or tests that measure AP activity that were tested in parallel. The RSID?‐Semen kit also allows sampling a fraction of a questioned stain while retaining the majority of the sample for further processing through short tandem repeat analysis.     

Diagnostic Value of PSA and AP Tests for the Detection of Spermatozoa in Postmortem Swabs from the Genital and Anal Region in Males

The aim of this study was to clarify whether positive results for prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and acid phosphatase (AP) occur in postmortem swabs from the genito‐anal region in males (n = 80; 4 regions) and females (n = 20; 3 regions) and to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) concerning the presence of spermatozoa. In male subjects, the highest incidence of positive test results was found in urethral swabs (PSA 76%, AP 71%) and the lowest frequencies appeared in perianal and rectal swabs (15–20%). Microscopic evaluation for spermatozoa was positive between 39% in urethral swabs and 1% in rectal swabs. PPV regarding positive identification of spermatozoa was 33.3% for PSA and 31.5% for AP. The combination of both tests yielded a PPV of 38.2%. In female cases, no spermatozoa were identified, and one case was PSA‐ and AP‐positive in perianal swabs. Our findings indicate that PSA and AP tests are of limited value for the postmortem detection of spermatozoa in male subjects.     

Identification of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Spermatozoa from a Mixture of Semen and Simulated Gastric Juice

Abstract:  The detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and visualization of spermatozoa from forensic-type samples containing semen exposed to simulated gastric juice was investigated as a support for forensic practice. Samples of simulated gastric juice mixed with semen were prepared and incubated for up to 4 h at 37°C. Samples were deposited on cotton cloth and on ceramic plates and allowed to dry. The samples were examined for the presence of PSA using the Seratec^® PSA Semiquant immunochromatographic membrane test. Microscope slides were prepared, stained, and analyzed for spermatozoa. Spermatozoa were detected in all samples, and PSA was detected on neat samples and on samples from the ceramic plate after incubation for up to 4 h. PSA was not detected in the samples deposited on cotton cloth at incubation times greater than 15 min. This may serve as a support for examinations performed when vomit or vomit-stained evidence is submitted for analysis.     

Optimisation of choline testing using Florence Iodine reagent,including comparative sensitivity and specificity with PSA and AP tests

The detection of semen in forensic science is essential in cases of sexual assault but can be problematic in the absence of spermatozoa. Choline is known to occur in high concentrations in seminal fluid and the Florence Iodine test for its detection has been used in forensic science for many years, however very little is documented regarding its sensitivity and specificity in forensic casework. This paper describes the optimisation of the choline Florence Iodine test (FI) and investigates the sensitivity and specificity of the test against different body fluids, food and drink substances, cleaning products and laboratory chemicals. Comparative testing against Acid Phosphatase (AP) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA Seratec®) tests is described and shows that the FI test has greater specificity than the PSA test which cross reacts with a number of body fluids.     

The fallacy of the two-minute acid phosphatase cut off

Research was carried out to determine whether the likelihood of obtaining a positive Acid Phosphatase (AP) test result is affected by the make and type of paper used. Also, we aimed to investigate the frequency of AP positive reactions occurring after 2min using a series of known semen dilutions and to determine whether spermatozoa transfer onto the paper during the act of AP screening. In this research, most brands of paper tested were able to detect a 1 in 40 semen dilution within 2min. Leaving AP test papers for longer will allow the detection of greater dilutions of semen and as the amount of ejaculation is not reliably known in most casework situations and levels of AP activity can vary in different men, this will increase the seminal detection rate in sexual offence allegations.     

A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples

The recent formation of a United Kingdom and Irish working group, the Body Fluids Forum (BFF), highlighted the need to investigate different working practices prior to any inter-laboratory comparison work and identification of best practice. Various dilutions of semen were seeded onto swabs and cloth samples for each BFF member laboratory to test using their standard techniques. The results showed that the detection of acid phosphatase on swabs is best achieved using direct testing rather than on an extract from the swab. Extraction methods for spermatozoa require a balance to be achieved between using a sufficient volume of water to ensure optimal release and minimal volume to ensure a concentrated extract. PSA tests were investigated and found to be more sensitive than Choline. DNA profiles were obtained from samples in which no spermatozoa had been detected during microscopic examination.     

An evaluation of an enzymatic choline determination for the identification of semen in casework samples

This study compares the detection of choline in seminal stains by both an enzymatic method and by the standard Florence crystal test. The tests were conducted on 293 actual casework samples. In those samples identified as containing semen, choline was detected twice as often by the enzymatic method compared to the Florence method (84.6 versus 40.3%). The choline results were correlated with spermatozoa and acid phosphatase tests. The enzymatic detection of choline in seminal stains was found to be a fast, easy, sensitive, and reliable test.     

Identification of human semenogelin in membrane strip test as an alternative method for the detection of semen

Semenogelin (Sg), a protein originating in the seminal vesicles and a substrate for prostate specific antigen (PSA or p30), is a useful marker for the identification of semen. And detection of Sg has been available commercially in a membrane test recently. PSA is commonly used to detect semen in forensic significant samples taken from sexual assault cases. The strip PSA test has been available commercially from various manufacturers for many years. In this study, we evaluated two immunochromatographic membrane tests, one for Sg and the other for PSA by analyzing human semen, other human bodily fluids/materials including urine, blood, saliva, sweat, breast milk, vaginal secretion and fecal materials, semen from various animals and forensic casework samples. The data demonstrate that both Sg and PSA strip tests provide rapid and sensitive method for identification of seminal plasma. These results show that the immunochromatographic method for Sg detection is useful for the identification of seminal plasma in forensic samples, an alternative to the method for PSA detection.     

Use of a Y chromosome probe as an aid in the forensic proof of sexual assault

Currently, the most common procedures for the forensic identification of semen that may be present due to a sexual assault include the microscopic identification of spermatozoa, acid phosphatase activity, or the detection of PSA. However, not all cases of sexual assault result in the deposit of semen. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) has been found to be a very sensitive and specific method for detection of the Y chromosome from male cells. This study was undertaken to demonstrate the presence of epithelial cells of male origin in the postcoital vaginal tract using a commercially available probe. Results identified Y chromosome in intact epithelial cells on postcoital Days 1 through 4, and on Day 7. Additionally, Y chromosome positive epithelial cells were identified in vaginal swabs obtained following intercourse with no ejaculation. The method developed in this study demonstrates that FISH is a sensitive method for the identification of the presence of male epithelial cells in the postcoital vagina.     

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA, also known as p30), a glycoprotein produced by the prostatic gland and secreted into seminal plasma, is a marker used for demonstrating the presence of seminal fluid. Methods for the detection of PSA include Ouchterlony double diffusion, crossover electrophoresis, rocket immuno-electrophoresis, radial immunodiffusion, and ELISA. The extremely sensitive ELISA technique can detect PSA in concentrations as low as approximately 4 ng/mL. However, all these techniques are cumbersome and time consuming to perform in forensic laboratories, especially when only a few samples per week are processed. Various membrane tests are currently used in clinical settings to screen a patient's serum for the presence of PSA at levels greater than 4 ng/mL. In this study we evaluated three immunochromatographic PSA membrane tests by analyzing semen stains stored at room temperature for up to 30 years, post-coital vaginal swabs taken at different time after intercourse, semen-free vaginal swabs, and various female and male body fluids, including urine. The data demonstrate that PSA membrane test assays offer the same sensitivity as ELISA-based tests and provide a rapid approach for the forensic identification of seminal fluid. Furthermore, when the supernatant from a DNA extraction is used for the assay, there is essentially no DNA consumption for determining the presence of PSA in a forensic sample.     

Use of prostate specific antigen in the identification of semen in postmortem cases

Over the past 20 years, the use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as evidence of the presence of semen in forensic cases has been well established. In this study, we compared a commercially available immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for the identification of PSA with the identification of spermatozoa in swabs obtained from the vagina of deceased females. There was agreement between the 2 methods in 67 of the 80 cases (84%), including 18 cases where both the PSA was positive and sperm were observed microscopically. The remaining cases had 1 positive result and 1 negative result. We concluded that although there was substantial agreement between the presence of sperm and a positive PSA, there were enough discrepancies between the 2 methods (16%) to justify the use of both methodologies, if possible, to make the determination of sexual activity prior to death.     

Use of the "SMITEST" PSA card to identify the presence of prostate-specific antigen in semen and male urine

To determine whether the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) could be identified in semen using the "SMITEST" PSA immunochromatographic membrane test card, we examined semen and other body fluids, including urine. Although PSA activity was detected in semen with high sensitivity using the "SMITEST" PSA card, it was also detected in adult male urine. However, the lower detectable limit in the urine was 1000-fold lower than that in semen. The concentration of PSA in adult male urine was found to be 800 ng/ml using the card. PSA activity usually can be detected in urine of individuals over 14 years old and it has been detected in urine from children as young as 11 years old. Therefore, the appearance of PSA in urine may occur anytime between the age of 12 and 14 years. To determine the stability of PSA activity in urine, dried samples of urine on filter paper were kept at room temperature for up to 3 years. Although the immunoreactive line showing PSA activity became weak after storage, it was still detectable, but faint, after 3 years. In addition, PSA activity was not detected in male serum or saliva and in the urine from human females, male cats or male dogs using the PSA card. We conclude that the PSA card is useful for identification of PSA in both semen and adult male urine.     

Validation of the use of a commercially available kit for the identification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in semen stains

PSA is currently being used to detect and monitor quantitatively the development of prostate cancer by serum levels of PSA and has also been found to be present in high concentrations in semen. Elegantly simple, sensitive, and reproducible methods have been developed for analysis of the presence of PSA, including the Tandem-E PSA Immunoenzymetric Assay. The most common procedures for the forensic identification of semen have focused on the microscopic detection of sperm, acid phosphatase activity, and immunoelectrophoretic methods for the detection of PSA. Although these methods have been used for many years, there are problems associated with each method. The Tandem-E PSA Immunoenzymetric Assay detected PSA in 100% of the forensic casework fabric samples, 80% of the forensic casework vaginal swabs and 100% of the vasectomized individuals tested. The cut-off value was determined to be 1.77 ng/mL. These results indicate that this method can be used to identify the presence of semen in forensically significant specimens.     

不同温度下离体人静脉血ATP含量与死亡时间的关系

目的探讨在环境温度变化条件下,人体静脉血ATP降解与死亡时间的关系。方法健康志愿者48名,随机分为6组,肱静脉取静脉血,置于10℃、15℃、20℃、25℃、30℃和35℃下保存;每4h应用ATP检测仪对不同温度下的ATP含量进行检测;应用SPSS统计软件进行回归分析,MATLAB软件进行差值函数分析拟合。结果各温度组ATP值随死亡时间延长均呈下降趋势,从取血即刻的1 573.683 E-13mol/L,降至6.00 E-13mol/L左右,所经历的时间分别为236h(10℃)、163h(15℃)、124h(20℃)、92h(25℃)、72h(30℃)和64h(35℃),对所得数据进行回归分析,得到各温度组下ATP含量变化与PMI关系的二元三次曲线方程(R2范围为0.976～0.990);进行差值拟合,得到10～35℃范围内ATP含量变化与PMI关系的三元四次曲面方程。结论在不同温度下,人体静脉血ATP降解与PMI关系符合三元四次方程分布,利用差值函数拟合的方法可在温度变化条件下进行死亡时间推断。     

Stability of prostate specific antigen (PSA), and subsequent Y-STR typing, of Lucilia (Phaenicia) sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) maggots reared from a simulated postmortem sexual assault.

Rape-homicide represents one of the most heinous crimes, but which are also the hardest to solve due to the high occurrence of stranger-to-stranger interaction. This is the first case of obtaining P30 and Y-STR typing from a simulated postmortem sexual assault. 2, 3.5 and 6 microl of liquid semen was added to a liver substrate and Lucilia (Phaenicia) sericata (Meigen) eggs added. The larvae fed upon the semen coated substrate and were removed for testing after 48 and 145h after initial liquid semen deposition. P30 was recorded from whole postfeeding larvae after 145h, with correct Y-STR profiles obtained from the crop of actively feeding second instar larvae after 48h of initial semen deposition. The ability to obtain P30 and Y-STR profiles from larvae infesting a cadaver, with the suspicion of sexual assault having occurred prior to death, provides a new avenue to aid in the solving of such crimes.     

The evaluation of an ELISA for semen-specific 19-OH prostaglandin F1 alpha/F2 alpha using ex-casework swabs and stains

The application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for 19-OH Prostaglandin F1 alpha/F2 alpha (19-OH PG F) to casework analysis of seminal contamination of swabs and stains is reported. The results are compared to those where the identification of semen was based on the presence of acid phosphatase and spermatozoa. Five hundred and one samples were analysed and there was good agreement between the results of ELISA and conventional methods. The determination of 19-OH PG F confirmed both the presence of semen where spermatozoa were absent and indicated semen was present when acid phosphatase and spermatozoa were both absent. The results indicate that 19-OH PG F represents a useful marker for the casework identification of semen and is particularly valuable where spermatozoa are absent.     

The Stability of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Semen Under Various Temperatures

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is most commonly used for identifying semen, especially in the absence of sperm. However, PSA concentration varies according to storage temperature and duration, and little is known about its stability in semen. This study was therefore aimed to determine the stability under five different temperatures: −80, −20, 4, 25, and 37°C; and nine different durations: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 days. All samples were stored at −80°C after being secreted from the volunteers' body until analyzed. Results showed that the PSA concentration declined significantly over time under all temperatures studied except −80°C. At −20 and 4°C, PSA was still detectable on Day 180 with 50% and 70% decrease from its original concentration, respectively. At 25 and 37°C, PSA was detected up to Day 7 and 3, respectively. This information might assist forensic scientists understand more about PSA nature and integrate it into their works.     

Immunologic sperm detection]

Proof of prostatic acid phosphatase with the enzyme-immuno-assay (EIA) is specific and as sensitive as the common phosphatase reaction. The EIA for prostatic-specific-antigen (PSA) is prostate specific as well, but less sensitive than the phosphatase assay. In a review of 30 own cases no indications for nonspecifity of the immuno assay were obtained. A positive EIA-test in absence of spermatozoa can be explained by either azoospermia or a prolonged persistence of prostatic acid phosphatase in comparison with spermatozoa.     

Human semen stain analysis in casework sample by HRM-qPCR

Determining the biological origin of body fluid evidence from crime scenes is extremely important for criminal investigation, especially in sexual assault cases. In Brazil, sexual crimes still present low-resolution rates, where approximately 8% of cases are judged. The determination of the presence of semen in samples from crime scenes as a test prior to DNA analysis is a mandatory requirement in forensic analysis and can help to better understand the dynamics of the event. This report aims to present the methodological strategy used in a criminal case of a home invasion where a t-shirt containing visible stains similar to human semen was found at the site. Convencional tests to detect the presence of PSA and sperm cells were performed on the fabric cutouts which showed negative results. We then processed the fabric samples for genetic analysis after two-years-storage, where were performed automated method for the genetic material isolation (QIAcube, Qiagen). The Real-time PCR analysis were carried out using the SOLIScript 1-step SolisGreen (SolisBiodyne) kit, with specific primers to the TGM4 (Transglutaminase 4) gene, in the Rotor Gene Q-5Plex HRM equipment (Qiagen). The results obtained for the melt curve indicated the presence of human semen in the analyzed samples. After the HRM-qPCR assay we also analyzed the a-STR and Y-STR markers. All the results were useful for the criminal process, which led to the identification of the author of the crime.     

Detection of semen in stains on material evidences by quantitative immunofluorescence test

Russian and foreign methods used in forensic medicine for detection of the semen in stains on material evidences are compared. The potentialities of quantitative immunofluorescence test for detection of the semen in stains on material evidences, developed at Bureau for Forensic Medical Expert Evaluations of the Leningrad region, are described. Unlike other methods used in Russia, this method detects the semen in stains in the absence of spermatozoa and in stains with very low amount of the semen. Our modification allows objective recording of the results with computer processing. The method is cheaper than its foreign analogs and its sensitivity is similar to them.