共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
<正>The Report of the 18thNational Congress of the CPC pointed out that we must earnestly promote public diplomacy.The key phrases here areweandearnestly.Who arewe?What kind of organizations and people does it refer to?How can beearnest?These questions are worth the contemplation of people like us who are performing China’s public diplomacy. 相似文献
3.
吴伟 《俄罗斯中亚东欧研究》2002,(5):33-39
戈尔恰科夫活动的时期正是俄国处境艰难、发生急剧变革的关键时期.他提出的外交思想及其进行的实践,围绕的核心就是如何在不利的情况下维护俄国的国家利益.他提出韬光养晦、养精蓄锐,树立起集中精力进行国内各项改革的对外政策大局观;以国家利益为最高原则,使外交摆脱或是少受意识形态思维的影响;运用灵活的策略手段,在对外交往中刚柔相济;对所确定的对外政策目标,坚定不移、百折不挠地付诸实现;并利用机会,提升俄国的国际地位,重新发挥大国作用.戈尔恰科夫的外交遗产对俄罗斯提倡和推行国内优先战略和更加清醒、务实的对外政策,具有重要意义. 相似文献
4.
Mark A. Boyer Donald Gordon Makram Haluani Elena N. Kasimovskaya Ki –Jung Kim Zlatko abi Patrick J. McGowan & Philip Nel 《国际研究展望》2002,3(3):235-257
Thanks to a suggestion made by Tim Shaw (Dalhousie University), the Editors of ISP decided about a year ago to commission a discussion of the textbook Power, Wealth and Global Order: An International Relations Textbook for Africa. This symposium aims at increasing our understanding of the different, regionally specific perspectives that can be brought to bear when studying international relations outside of North America and Western Europe. We want to thank Prof. Donald Gordon for the time he spent on examining the volume at hand and for his insightful analysis of the contribution made by the editors and authors of the textbook. Based on this discussion, we then asked four other authors from diverse areas of the world (Venezuela, Korea, Slovenia, and Russia) to read Prof. Gordon's analysis and respond to a set of questions we posed to them. Those questions and their comments follow Prof. Gordon's essay. We would also like to invite other ISA members from anywhere in the world to comment on this subject, as a continuing effort to engage important pedagogical topics in the pages of ISP. 相似文献
5.
日前,同济大学国际与公共事务研究院在沪揭牌成立,并与上海市国际关系学会联合主办"中国特色外交理论发展"学术研讨会.来自上海社会科学院、复旦大学、上海交大、上海外国语大学、上海国际问题研究院和同济大学等单位的70余位专家学者与会.会议围绕"国际机制与中国外交"、"海权与中国外交"、"热点外交"和"中国特色外交理论创新"等问题进行探讨,提出了不少有益的见解. 相似文献
6.
新世纪中国民间外交研究:问题、理论和意义 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
进入新世纪以来,民间外交在世界范围内得到蓬勃发展,呈现出全方位、多形式和立体交叉的新格局,对15世纪以来主要以国与国之间官方交流渠道为主的外交观形成巨大压力和挑战.人们日益认识到主权国家委派的代表之间正式的、官方的、政府对政府的互动,未必是保障国际合作、消除分歧或者平息冲突的最有效方式.改革开放以来,中国继承和发扬民间外交的优良传统,在民间外交方面取得重大成就,但无论在认识上还是实践中仍存在一些误区和盲点.本文以全球视野分析了新世纪民间外交的变化趋势,探讨了当代民间外交亟需深入研究的问题以及加强民间外交研究的重要意义. 相似文献
7.
和平共处五项原则是中国外交的根本指导原则。在“五项原则”的指引下,新时期中国外交在理论上不断创新和发展,在实践中开拓进取,不断开创新局面。事实证明,中国既是和平共处五项原则的首倡者,也是和平共处五项原则的忠实实践者。中国是维护世界和平、促进世界发展和人类进步的坚定力量。 相似文献
8.
《中国国际问题研究》2018,(1)
正The 2017 Symposium on International Developments and China's Diplomacy,coorganized by CIIS and China Foundation for International Studies(CFIS),was held in Beijing on December 9,2017.Foreign Minister Wang Yi attended the opening and delivered a keynote speech entitledChina's Diplomacy 相似文献
9.
《中国国际问题研究》2017,(1)
<正>The 2016 Symposium on International Developments and China's Diplomacy,co-organized by CIIS and China Foundation for International Studies(CFIS),was held in Beijing on December 3-4,2016.Foreign Minister Wang Yi attended the opening and delivered a keynote speech entitledChina's Diplomacy in 2016:Blazing New Paths and Making New Progress.(Read the speech on Page 5)The 相似文献
10.
《中国国际问题研究》2016,(1)
正The Symposium on the International Developments and China's Diplomacy in 2015,co-hosted by China Institute of International Studies(CIIS)and China Foundation for International Studies(CFIS),was held in Beijing on December 12-13,2015.The Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi attended the opening ceremony and delivered a speech entitled2015:A Year of Flying Colors for Pursuing Major-Country Diplomacy with Distinctive 相似文献
11.
去年11月18日—19日,中国国际问题研究所和中国国际问题研究和学术交流基金会举办了“中国能源战略与能源外交”研讨会。参加会议的有我国三大油气集团及所属勘探、设计和研究机构的企业家和专家学者,国家计委、外经贸部等职能部委的代表,北京、上海、吉林、兰州等地研究机构和高等学府的专家学者,外交部有关司的代表和我国前驻一些产油国的大使共60多人。会议讨论了三个问题:一、世界油气供需状况和发展趋势以及大国能源战略和对中国的启示;二、中国油气资源储量、生产潜力和需求前景以及中国开发国外能源状况和前景;三、中国的能源… 相似文献
12.
本文探讨了中国公共外交的指导理论、沟通理论和价值观理论,建立了基本的理论框架,分析了三者之间的关系,认为必须从中国外交理论出发,吸收国外理论的精华,针对中匡的战略目标,构建、丰富和发展中国特色的公共外交理论。 相似文献
13.
美国预防性外交的理念与主张 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
冷战结束以来,在外交和安全领域出现了两个新概念或新思维,即预防性外交和预防性防务。90年代中期以来,美国对这两个问题进行了深入研究,提出了一套系统的理论、政策和实施方案。顾名思义,预防性外交主要是用外交手段处理国际争端与暴力冲突;而预防性防务主要是以军事手段处理安全领域的问题,但在实施预防性防务之前也给外交斡旋留有一定的余地。冷战结束以来,军事领域的国际对话、合作与交往非常活跃;与此同时,以外交手段解决国际争端与武装冲突,以多边安全对话和建立信任措施为其主要特点,也日益成为外交舞台上的一种时尚。外交与防务两… 相似文献
14.
15.
Sun Cheng 《中国国际问题研究》2010,(2):151-168
A new chapter began in Japan's political history when Yukio Hatoyama and his Democratic Party (DPJ) replaced the long-governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), thus creating the long-contemplated structure of alternate rule by the two major political parties. Attaching more importance to independence in diplomacy, the Hatoyama Cabinet is expected to stand for a repositioning of its relations with the United States and make greater diplomatic efforts in Asia with the focus on building an East Asian Community so as to adapt to the evolving international relations in the Asia-Pacific region. 相似文献
16.
经济外交是中国—东盟自由贸易区建成后中国与东盟共同获取正和经济利益、化解地区内矛盾的一种新途径。本文从中国对东盟经济外交的实践着手,分析其对提升区域合作层次、构建中国和谐周边的作用,并探索性地指出中国在对东盟实施经济外交过程中几个值得关注的问题。 相似文献
17.
Yu Xintian 《中国国际问题研究》2010,(6):37-60
W hen it comes to public diplomacy, there are various approaches to the definition of such, both at home and abroad. Despite this diversity, however, it is the author's view that their basic connotations are somewhat similar in that they all refer to a situation in which a country, as represented by its government, in order to achieve its strategic goals, chooses to exchange views, converse and communicate with another country's populace, 相似文献
18.
《中国国际问题研究》2021,(4)
正On July 23,Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy Studies Center and the ROK's Sungkyun Institute of China Studies jointly held a seminar on A Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy. 相似文献
19.
20.
Two Complementary Settings of Peace-making Diplomacy: Political-Elite Diplomacy and Public Diplomacy
Sapir Handelman 《Diplomacy & Statecraft》2013,24(1):162-178
In terms of the question, “how to create an effective peace-making process in the Israeli–Palestinian case,” this article argues that the answer is a multidimensional approach to peace-making diplomacy that contains two main settings: political-elite diplomacy and public diplomacy. Political-elite diplomacy suggests various modes of peace-making interactions between political-elites. Public diplomacy provides instruments to involve the people in the peace-making struggle, prepares them for a change, and presses the leadership to reach agreements. The analysis suggests establishing an institution for the operation of public diplomacy—a major Israeli-Palestinian public negotiating congress. The congress is a democratic peace-making institution that invites representatives of the opposing societies to discuss, debate, and negotiate solutions to their struggle. The article also presents the concepts of political-elite diplomacy and public diplomacy as competitive settings that should be regarded as complementary. It includes lessons from the “Minds of Peace Experiment”—a small-scale Israeli–Palestinian public negotiating congress—which has been conducted in different places around the world. 相似文献