共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Satyajit Boolell SC 《Commonwealth Law Bulletin》2013,39(1):5-24
In this paper, the various challenges to the prosecutorial discretion of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) are identified. It deals with two distinct areas of prosecutorial discretion: first, the scope of judicial review relating to prosecutorial decision in the light of the Privy Council judgment of Mohit v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] UKPC 20; and secondly, the impact and implications of the decision of the Purdy case which imposes an obligation on the DPP to issue a policy statement as regards conduct which will not be the subject matter of a prosecution even though there may be sufficient evidence to prosecute such conduct under the relevant legislation. 相似文献
5.
6.
Asian Journal of Criminology - 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Crime, Law and Social Change - In non-democracies, lawyers face various constraints ranging from the absence of acquittals or violations of their clients’ rights to threats and criminal... 相似文献
13.
毒品及毒品鉴定(I) 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
近年来,毒品犯罪十分猖獗,严重威胁着全球的社会安定和经济发展,成为当今世界最严重的社会问题.任何一个国家和地区,一旦出现毒品问题,就必然诱发各种犯罪,使社会治安恶化,丑恶现象增加,造成对社会的政治、经济和文化秩序的巨大破坏. 相似文献
14.
15.
广州地区汉族群体mtDNA HV I区多态性 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
<正> 人类线粒体DNA(mtDNA)是一个闭合的、环状的双链DNA分子,大小为16569 bp,包含一个约1.1 kb长的非编码区(noncoding region)。由于其具较高的复制错误率和较低的修复能力,mtDNA分子,特别是在非编码区具有较高的多态性。mtDNA分子具有母系遗传、高拷贝数(1000~10000个拷贝/细胞)[1]等特点,非编码区的两个高度变异的区域HVRⅠ(hypervariable regionⅠ)和HVRⅡ(hypervari—able regionⅡ)已作为法医学个体识别非常有用的遗 相似文献
16.
18.
I服了YOU!这句话先送给大师老 谋子。 I服了YOU!这句话再送给陕西的 一些法官们。 早在上世纪90年代初,张艺谋把 电影《秋菊打官司》的背景弄在陕西,让 秋菊操了陕西口音,俺还看不出玄妙; 后来,陕西发生了"麻旦旦处女嫖娼 案"、"受害人在法院喝农药自杀案"、 "枪下留人案"、"夫妻家中看黄碟被抓 案"等等让全国瞪大眼睛的非凡案子, 俺好歹咂摸出一点味道了:如今,见了 《中国青年报》著名的《冰点》栏目3月 31日刊发了近万字的《十年磨一案》, 俺终于对那布满窑洞的陕西刮目相看 了,对那里的一些法官说一句:I服了 YOU!I五体投地般服了YOU! 相似文献
19.
20.
Svein Eng 《Ratio juris》2014,27(1):138-154
In A Theory of Justice (1971), John Rawls introduces the concept of “reflective equilibrium.” Although there are innumerable references to and discussions of this concept in the literature, there is, to the present author's knowledge, no discussion of the most important question: Why reflective equilibrium? In particular, the question arises: Is the method of reflective equilibrium applicable to the choice of this method itself? Rawls's drawing of parallels between Kant's moral theory and his own suggests that his concept of “reflective equilibrium” is on a par with Kant's concept of “transcendental deduction.” Treating these two approaches to justification as paradigmatic, I consider their respective merits in meeting the reflexive challenge, i.e., in offering a justification for choice of mode of justification. My enquiry into this topic comprises three parts. In this first part, I raise the issue of the reflexivity of justification and question whether the reflexive challenge can be met within the framework of A Theory of Justice. 相似文献