过境货物的知识产权边境执法措施研究

将边境执法措施扩展到进出口之外的过境环节是发达国家强化知识产权执法的新趋势.这一严厉措施引起了许多问题和争议.在国内法层面,多数国家并未赋予知识产权权利人控制过境行为的实体权利,针对过境货物的边境措施缺乏实体权利的支撑.在冲突法层面,由于过境货物特殊的法律状态,很难根据现有的知识产权法冲突规则协调货物过境国、来源国与目的国的法律适用解决法律选择问题.在国际法层面,针对过境货物的边境措施与世贸体制下就相关问题达成的多边协定,是否一致也存有很大疑问.由于面临诸多问题与争议,这一措施能否获得全面接受尚属未知,仍需进行一定调整.     

God in the Border Zones

The adaptation of the Orthodox Church to the new religious diversity is perhaps one of the most painful processes of contemporary religious life in Moldova.     

Border Bible

Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights through Border Measures—Lawand Practice in the EU By Olivier Vrins and Marius Schneider(eds), 2006, Oxford University Press Price: £175.00, Hardback,ISBN: 0–19–928879–8, 1424 pp   It is a brave person who takes on the border regulations inone jurisdiction, let alone all of those in the Community. Experiencehas shown that the questions arising under the European borderrules are rarely plain and never simple. Hence anybody takingon the task of writing or editing a book about such things     

论第三民事主体:无责任能力团体

在自然人、法人之外,还存在着“第三民事主体”.“其他组织”“非法人团体”“无权利能力社团”等名称都不适于作为第三民事主体的名称.民事责任能力是一种客观的财产能力,与民事主体的主观辨识能力无关.从第三民事主体无独立财产、不能独立承担民事责任的角度看,称之为“无责任能力团体”更为恰适.无责任能力团体具有民事权利能力和民事行为能力,但却不具有民事责任能力.有自己的名称,并以团体的名义对外实施民事活动,在法律无除外规定的情况下,由其成员承担无限连带责任的团体,即为无责任能力团体.     

The Ukrainian-Hungarian Border: Security and Cross-border relations

Lt. Colonel Dr János Sallai is head of the Research Management Department of the Management Training & Further Training Institute of the High School for Hungarian Police Officers. Captain Csaba Jónás is an assistant professor at the Criminalistics Department of the High School for Hungarian Police Officers.     

第三种力量：和谐社会的动力建构

和谐社会是一个动态的社会,是一个发展的社会,和谐社会的建构需要持续不断的动力源。第三种力量在这种社会动力建构中,以弥补政府与市场的传统力量不足应运而生,促进社会利益的和谐,并最终产生社会和谐利益。     

Maras Morphing: Revisiting Third Generation Gangs

Third generation street gangs are a crime and security problem in many global cities, internationally linked ethnic Diasporas, and cross-border regions where insecurity and criminal non-state actors reign. Widely known as third generation gangs (3 GEN Gangs), complex gangs operate with broad reach—often across borders—and can develop mercenary and at times political and potentially terrorist objectives. The typology of the three generations of gang evolution (based on the interaction of politicization, internationalization, and sophistication) is recounted, recent trends in transnational street and prison gangs are explored and future potentials are suggested.     

论跨境犯罪案件的协议管辖

解决跨境犯罪案件管辖冲突的一种有效方法是引进民事法律的协议管辖制度.有关法域可以通过协商并在考虑法定管辖原则、司法惯例和酌定因素的前提下达成管辖协议.目前,我国建立跨境协议管辖制度的切入点应当是完善规范和健全协调机制两个方面.根据客观实际,制订协议规范需要实施两步方略,协调机制应当有所创新.     

第三人利益合同之效力根源:法律对第三人合同利益之正当化

第三人利益合同之效力根源为法律对第三人合同利益的正当化.这一命题包括了两个方面的含义:其一,基础合同当事人对第三人利益的赋予为内在的根源,此为自律性的要素;其二,法律对第三人合同利益的正当化为外在根源,此为他律性要素.此二者不可截然分开,只有自律与他律的要素共同作用,才为第三人利益合同之效力根源提供法哲学上的解释.     

From Regulation to Behaviour Change: Giving Nudge the Third Degree

Behaviour change strategies such as ‘nudge’ have become hugely popular with administrations on both sides of the Atlantic. The practice of nudging, however, raises conceptual and controversial issues which must be addressed in examining the conditions under which nudging can be used effectively and acceptably. A key to a clear conceptual understanding of nudge‐related issues is to distinguish between three degrees of nudge. These three degrees raise different, and identifiable, concerns and it is possible to assess the extent to which these can be responded to in positive terms. The compatibility of nudging with other control devices cannot be assumed and, when contemplating nudging, it is essential to be transparent about its philosophical basis, as well as to be aware that different modes of intervention may operate with clashes of logic that threaten not only effectiveness but also the serving of representative and ethical ends.     

Police Cooperation across the Irish Border: Familiarity Breeding Contempt for Transparency and Accountability

This article critically examines the practice, methods, and regulation of cross‐border police cooperation between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Despite legal and political divisions, police cooperation has survived and flourished in recent years especially among police officers on the ground. By comparison, the development of transparent regulatory and accountability structures and processes has been disappointing. While there have been domestic initiatives at the intergovernmental and legislative levels, these have tended to emphasize the centrality of direct engagement between the police chiefs and senior civil servants at the expense of formal transparent procedures. EU instruments have been marginalized as the police forces and their administrations prefer informal networks and force‐to‐force agreements which, it is argued, shield cross‐border police cooperation from standards of transparency, oversight, and accountability which are essential to its legitimacy. They also highlight the limitations of the current EU legislative approach to cross‐border police cooperation.     

第三人欺诈与第三人胁迫

传统民法对第三人欺诈与第三人胁迫采取区分式的立法模式。在第三人欺诈情形,排除意思表示人针对善意相对人撤销其意思表示的权利;在第三人胁迫情形,则赋予意思表示人以无限制的撤销其意思表示的权利。区分模式忽视对交易安全的保障,造成法律制度内部的冲突。对第三人欺诈与第三人胁迫设立统一规则的模式具有诸多优点,在最近的民法理论中得到越来越多的支持。在未来中国民法典的编纂中,应对第三人欺诈与第三人胁迫采纳统一的规则模式,承认在无信赖利益保护需求时,被欺诈人与被胁迫人享有撤销权。