Decapitation and Dismemberment of the Corpse: A Matricide Case*

Abstract: Dismemberment of a corpse has always been viewed by society to be a more hideous crime than the homicide itself. In this study, we present a case of a 57‐year‐old woman who was decapitated and her right arm and both hands were dismembered. It was determined that the victim was murdered and dismembered by her 33‐year‐old daughter, who had been receiving treatment for schizophrenia for 15 years. On the victim’s head and back there were 71 incised and stab wounds in total. They were superficial, except the five stab wounds which were connected to the right chest cavity and which incapacitated the victim. Although there is not a regulation for the act of dismembering the corpse in the Turkish Penal Code, since this type of case is rare, the crime scene and the autopsy findings were evaluated together with other pertinent data available in the literature.     

Homicides with Mutilation of the Victim's Body

Abstract:  Information on homicide offenders guilty of mutilation is sparse. The current study estimates the rate of mutilation of the victim's body in Finnish homicides and compares sociodemographic characteristics, crime history, life course development, psychopathy, and psychopathology of these and other homicide offenders. Crime reports and forensic examination reports of all offenders subjected to forensic examination and convicted for a homicide in 1995–2004 ( n  = 676) were retrospectively analyzed for offense and offender variables and scored with the Psychopathy Check List Revised. Thirteen homicides (2.2%) involved mutilation. Educational and mental health problems in childhood, inpatient mental health contacts, self-destructiveness, and schizophrenia were significantly more frequent in offenders guilty of mutilation. Mutilation bore no significant association with psychopathy or substance abuse. The higher than usual prevalence of developmental difficulties and mental disorder of this subsample of offenders needs to be recognized.     

Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry Profiles Predict Later Risk for Criminal Behavior and Violent Crimes in Former Inpatients with Affective Disorder*

Abstract: Few studies have investigated criminal and violent behavior in patients with affective disorders. We reviewed the national crime register for records of criminal offenses committed by 1561 patients with affective disorders and studied the predictive value of certain psychopathological symptoms assessed with the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) system concerning future criminal behavior. Sixty‐five (4.2%) patients had been convicted in the 7–12 years after discharge (307 cases). Patients with the AMDP syndrome mania had a significantly higher risk for later criminal behavior. The combination with the hostility syndrome further increased the risk. These findings are in line with previous data indicating a higher risk for later criminal behavior in patients with a manic/bipolar disorder compared to depressive disorder. As previously demonstrated in another sample of schizophrenic patients, the AMDP syndromes mania (and hostility) is associated with a higher risk of later criminal behavior.     

船舶螺旋桨损伤特点及成伤机制

目的总结船舶螺旋桨损伤的主要特点,探讨螺旋桨损伤的特点及形成机制,探索螺旋桨损伤与碎尸的鉴别方法。方法收集浙江省湖州地区1994─2005年尸检的100余例船舶螺旋桨损伤案例,对螺旋桨造成的损伤（擦划伤、表皮剥脱、创、骨折和全部离断创）的特点,以及衣着特征,进行回顾性分析。并与常见碎尸案中使用的工具造成的断面特征进行比较。结果船舶螺旋桨损伤是高速旋转螺旋桨的巨大劈力和机械切削所造成的损伤;碎尸是人为使用锐器切割或砍击尸体。两者由于形成机理、作用力及反作用力大小不同,导致损伤断面呈现不同的特征。结论船舶螺旋桨损伤具有独特的特征,可与碎尸损伤进行鉴别。     

中美司法精神病学鉴定制度比较

拥有专门知识的人才进入司法程序,凭其专业知识对专门技术问题发表意见。这样的人在大陆法系被称为鉴定人,在英美法系则被称为专家证人,我国使用鉴定人称谓。本文从司法鉴定管理体制、司法鉴定人制度、司法鉴定启动制度及司法鉴定程序制度等方面对中美两国司法精神病学的司法鉴定制度进行比较。最后简要介绍两个特殊的问题:最终争论和结论质证。     

精神分裂症者凶杀行为特征与其刑事责任能力相关性

目的探讨精神分裂症者凶杀行为特征及影响刑事责任能力评定的因素。方法自制调查表收集并比较经司法鉴定为具有凶杀行为的精神分裂症嫌疑人(n=110)与具有凶杀行为的无精神病者(n=70)的一般人口学资料、临床资料、作案行为特征、刑事责任能力等指标,并采用Logistic回归分析法探讨影响精神分裂症嫌疑人刑事责任能力的相关因素。结果精神分裂症组和无精神病组在年龄、性别、文化程度、婚姻状态方面差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组在案发前思维障碍、情绪状态、社会功能等疾病相关因素方面差异均存在统计学意义(P0.05),并在攻击行为史、作案先兆、诱因、预谋、作案动机、作案对象、环境辨认、自我保护等一些与案情有关的特点上存在差异(均P0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,精神分裂症组的刑事责任能力与案发前思维障碍、情绪状态、社会功能、动机、预谋、自我保护性等因素有关(P0.05)。结论为提高对具有凶杀行为的精神分裂症嫌疑人刑事责任能力评定的准确性,应综合考虑相关精神病理因素及作案特征的影响。     

修订版外显攻击行为量表用于精神疾病患者危险行为评估

目的 探讨修订版外显攻击行为量表(Modified Overt Aggression Scales,MOAS)对精神疾病患者危险行为评估的价值.方法 采用MOAS对隶属公安、卫生、民政系统的3家精神卫生机构(安康监管病区、华西心理卫生中心、德康救治病区)共490名精神疾病患者根据痛史资料进行评估. 结果 无危险行为31...     

眼球运动参数在图片填充测验中识别合作程度的准确性分析

目的研究不同眼球运动参数在识别颅脑外伤所致精神障碍患者在图片填充测验过程中合作与不合作的准确性差异。方法收集进行精神伤残程度评定的颅脑外伤所致精神障碍患者140例,以韦氏智力测验中“图片填充”的21张图片作为刺激图片,根据二项必选数字记忆测验及鉴定专家意见分为合作组与不合作组,通过SMI眼动追踪系统获取研究对象在完成21张图片填充过程中的眼球运动参数,利用ROC曲线评估眼球运动参数在识别颅脑外伤患者在精神伤残程度评定中合作与不合作的准确程度。结果就整个图片填充测验过程而言,眨眼次数、注视次数、瞳孔直径、眼跳次数、眼跳潜伏期、眼跳平均加速度、眼跳平均纵向速度、眼跳峰值纵向速度的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)值大于0.5,其中眨眼次数的AUC值为0.645,优于其他眼球运动参数。具体到单个刺激图片,眨眼次数在特定刺激图片下的AUC值可大于0.8,瞳孔X轴直径的AUC值可大于0.7。结论眼球运动参数识别颅脑外伤所致精神障碍患者合作与不合作的准确程度与刺激图片有关,眨眼次数分辨合作与不合作的准确性要优于其他眼球运动参数。     

A Preliminary Assessment of the Identification of Saw Marks on Burned Bone*

Abstract: This study assesses the degree of modification to the saw mark characteristics of dismembered skeletal remains when exposed to a controlled outdoor fire of limited duration. The sample consists of 36 adult pig hind limbs which were dismembered fleshed. Six handsaws and six power saws were used, with three limbs dismembered and burned for each of the saw types. Results indicate that fire exposure affects the visibility and identifiability of saw mark striae. With the handsaws, the bow saw, hacksaw, and keyhole saw were consistently recognizable. In the power saw group, the saw marks of the jigsaw, reciprocating saw, and chainsaw remained identifiable. Although the bone ends exhibited thermal alterations, the false starts were well preserved with minimal damage. Given the parameters of this study, it is possible to identify the class of saw based on the diagnostic characteristics present on the cremated bones.     

对邱兴华杀人案的司法鉴定学反思

关于邱兴华杀人案（下称邱案）的各种学术讨论和争论似乎已经不少，但查阅文献发现，有关邱案的文章，分别是从刑事诉讼法学、刑事证据学、刑事心理学、精神医学角度，法制新闻学以及从人权保护，法治进步等角度对该案进行解读。然而既然这是一个涉及司法鉴定的个案（虽然实际上并没有进行任何实质性鉴定活动），那么从司法鉴定学的角度对与该案有关的几个最基本的问题进行理论阐述，或许能有些许不同的作用。这几个问题包括：精神病概念的辨析，是否患病与是否需要接受刑事处罚之间是什么关系，何时需要启动司法精神医学鉴定？应如何配置我国刑事诉讼中的司法精神医学鉴定启动模式？