试论市场规制法与行政法的关系

市场规制法是实体法和具体行政程序法的结合 ,市场规制法以公法为主 ,兼有公私法融合的特点 ,其私权救济部分通过民事诉讼实施 ,其刑事制裁部分除独立性的散在立法外已归入刑法典 ,均通过刑事诉讼实施 ,而其基本的实施方法则是行政和行政诉讼。     

运动式执法的司法规制与政府有效治理

在我国漫长的国家治理进程中,运动式治理、运动式执法作为国家治理逻辑的重要组成部分,始终存在并且总以一定方式在特定阶段反复出现。运动式治理、运动式执法与法治精神完全相悖,会直接冲击正常的法治秩序。因此,在推进依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的伟大进程中,必须对我国运动式治理、运动式执法的国家治理逻辑进行深刻反思,通过及时引入司法审查机制,把运动式治理、运动式执法控制在有限范围内。在对运动式执法案件进行司法审查时,需要直面解决社会公共问题的依法解决、公共政策的合法性审查以及大面积违法行政行为的司法应对等重要课题。在推进国家治理体系现代化中,需要对运动式执法进行改革,其中重点需做好加强立法协调统一,推进行政决策法治化,保障人民法院依法独立行使审判权,塑造政府、市场、社会良性互动关系等工作。     

Regulation by Blockchain: the Emerging Battle for Supremacy between the Code of Law and Code as Law

This paper critically examines the intersection and interactions between conventional law produced and enforced by national legal systems (ie the ‘code of law’) and the internal rules of blockchain systems, which take the form of executable software code and cryptographic algorithms operating across a distributed computing network (‘code as law’).  In so doing, it seeks to identify whether, and to what extent, ‘regulation by blockchain’ will successfully avoid governance by conventional law.   It identifies three different ways in which the code of law is likely to interact with code as law, based primarily on the intended motives and purposes of those engaged in activities in developing, maintaining or undertaking transactions upon the network.  It argues that these different classes of case are likely to generate different kinds of dynamic interaction between the blockchain code and conventional legal systems, and critically examines the normative foundations of these emerging and anticipated interactions.     

政府采购制度与体育产业化

政府采购是市场经济条件下国家实行经济管理的一种重要方式,建立和完善政府采购制度,是现代各国的共同作法,也是 WTO 的要求。体育产业化作为我国体育事业市场化改革的必然趋势客观要求实行政府采购制度,而政府采购制度的实施对促进我国体育产业化的健康发展具有相当重要的作用。目前我国关于体育设施和服务方面的政府采购制度还有待完善。     

Enforcing the Law and Being a State

Many anarchists believe that a stateless society could and should feature laws. It might appear that, in so believing, they are caught in a contradiction. The anarchist objects to the state because its authority does not rest on actual consent, and using force to secure compliance with law in a stateless society seems objectionable for the same reason. Some people in a stateless society will have consented to some laws or law-generating mechanisms and some to others – while some will have consented to none. Someone’s obedience to a legal requirement could be justly enforceable absent the state, nonetheless, given either her actual consent to the requirement or to a mechanism responsible for generating it or the coextensiveness of the legal requirement with a moral requirement. And it could thus be just on the anarchist’s own terms to enforce a narrow range of positive legal requirements even against outlaws who had declined to consent to them.     

国家赔偿和《国家赔偿法》

《国家赔偿法》的出台 ,是我国立法史上的重大进步 ,但在实施过程中有不完善的地方。修改和补充规范 ,使国家赔偿的范围、方式和程序更加合乎社会发展的需要 ,正确处理国家机关的权力与公民、法人和其他经济组织的权利的关系 ,以保证权力的正确实施和权利的依法实现。     

体育运动中性别歧视的法律规制简

体育性别歧视是体育运动中对某种性别参与者的不平等对待.奥林匹克运动有性别歧视的传统.体育性别歧视的样态表现在：体育参与机会不均等、同工不同酬和体育性骚扰.它侵权的类别有：体育参与权、体育劳动权和体育人格权.反体育性别歧视的法律制度体现在国际公约方面和国内立法方面.体育性别歧视法律应对机制存在不足,应该对其进行完善.     

私法内的管制——《劳动合同法》规范结构的初步整理

《劳动合同法》是国家管制贯彻于合同关系始终,亦即管制呈现为结构性介入的调整劳资关系的法律。该法调整劳动合同关系的基本技术形态仍是私法性的,但国家管制借助于这些技术,以强制性规范的方式全面渗透到劳动合同关系的主要方面,并集中落实在对劳动力交易对价以及劳动关系解除成本的控制上,其稳定就业和提高劳动力交易价格的劳工政策目的十分明显。同时,国家通过三方协调机制的设置,在劳动关系持续发展过程中充当着启动并引导"当场交易",维系劳资关系动态平衡的实质作用。     

论人与自然关系的法律化

当代人与自然关系存在阻碍生产力发展的趋势,不符合社会正义原则,违背了国家在人与自然关系上必须承担的国家契约义务;第三次法律革命的直接结果就是人与自然关系成为法律调整的对象。在此基础上,本文论证了法律调整人与自然关系的正当性和必要性。     

The Regulation of Public Procurement as a Key Element of European Economic Law

This article aims to investigate the regulation of public purchasing from an interdisciplinary perspective. It endeavours to provide its audience with the broad framework of the function of public procurement and public purchasing in the common market and the Member States, as well as the legal and socio-economic parameters which determine this newly regulated field. It also intends to enable its readers to understand and appreciate the impact of the liberalisation of public markets on the whole process of European integration, as it places the regulation of public procurement within the framework of the four freedoms, as well as within the EU's key policies.     

概念法学和政府管制背景下的新行政法

站在中国行政法学百年发展的历史图景之上进行反思和总结,应该善待概念行政法学的方法论和知识论。外接管制的新行政法强调横向地研究"事务"而不是理论,它有自己新的价值范畴和问题域。但是,政府管制之下的新行政法只有借助概念法学的范畴体系和逻辑思辨方式,才可能实现其功能主义的目标,否则将陷入"问题陷阱"。台湾概念行政法学的发展方向值得祖国大陆借鉴,在概念法学的塑造下,部门行政法与政府管制研究的结合之路是祖国大陆行政法学的可欲之路。中国行政法学的困境不是概念法学的困境。外接政府管制的新行政法,一定程度上将弥补司法审查制度缺陷带来的概念行政法学的功能性不足。     

'New Governance' in European Corporate Law Regulation as Transnational Legal Pluralism

The present transformation of European corporate governance regulation mirrors the challenges that have been facing the EU's continuously evolving polity, marked by tensions between centralised integration programmes, on the one hand, and Member State's embedded capitalisms, path-dependencies and rent-seeking, on the other. As longstanding concerns with remaining obstacles to more mobility for workers, services, business entities and capital in recent years are aligned with post-Lisbon commitments to creating the world's leading competitive market, European corporate governance regulation (ECGR) has become exposed to and implicated in a set of highly dynamic regulatory experiments. In this context, 'New Governance' offers itself as both a tentative label and immodest proposal for a more responsive and innovative approach to European law making. The following article assesses the recently emerging regulatory forms in ECGR as illustrations of far-reaching transformations in market governance. The arguable parallels between the EU's regulatory transformation in response to growing legitimacy concerns and the recurring question about whose interests a business corporation is intended to serve, provide the framework for an exploration of current regulatory trajectories in European corporate law that can most adequately be understood as a telling example of transnational legal pluralism.     

疑案·存案·结案——从春阿氏案看清代疑案了结技术

清末春阿氏杀夫案在司法档案和纪实小说中有着不同版本。刑部、法部和大理院轮番审理,未能查出事实真相。大理院迫于结案的压力,以存案的方式了结了该案。判决书内容含混,而处理疑案的技艺则甚为高超。以疑案及其结案技术为切入点,重新审视并评价皇权下的司法实况,可以观察到司法现实复杂而生动的本来面目。     

The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: the Case of Forestry

An important ensemble of transnational, transgovernmental regulatoryinstitutions has emerged in the forestry sector over the pastdecade. These ‘forest certification’ programmesset global standards for proper forest management and applythem through institutionalized licensing and inspection programmes.Similar programmes are appearing in other sectors. Developedlargely by environmental NGOs and industry associations ratherthan governments, forest certification programmes are nominallyvoluntary, but are becoming increasingly mandatory in practice.They are also gradually linking with government regulatory andmanagement programmes in various ways, while remaining in tensionboth with each other and with government programmes. The overallregulatory system is thus highly dynamic, as the programmescompete with each other for business and also with governmentregulatory programmes for public acceptance. This paper describesand assesses the administrative law – i.e., the requirementsfor rule-making and rule application – of the emergingglobal forest regulatory system. It finds that while the certificationprogrammes are becoming increasingly transparent and participatory,often comparing favourably with government programmes, someof them still need considerable improvement and all of themface serious challenges. It concludes with a discussion of theproblem of accountability, outlining the possibility that theprogrammes exemplify an emerging new kind of ‘learningaccountability’.     

作为一种"国家法与非国家法多元互动"的全球化进程——对"法律全球化"争辩的中立性批判

中国法学界的"全球化论辩"可以从"肯定"与"否定"这两种态度加以分析。以"国际化"与"全球化"的区分为参照性判准,可以发现,"反法律全球化"论者与对"法律全球化"持肯定态度中的"唯法律全球化"论者其实都处在着同"去国家化"相关的"法律一元论"这一层面上,只不过前者主张的是"国家法律一元论",而后者主张的是"非国家法律一元论"。"法律全球化"是一种在全球层面上展开的包含"法律国际化"的进程,是一种从"国家法律一元论"走向"国家与非国家法律多元论"的开放性进程。中国法学论者之所以尊奉"法律一元论",实是因为教条性地尊奉"法律的唯国家意志论"与"经济基础决定上层建筑"这两个经典论说的结果。     

国家调节:经济法逻辑起点的科学界定

逻辑起点的科学界定对经济法学科的形成和发展具有决定性的作用。我们说国家调节是经济法的逻辑起点,理由在于,国家调节是经济法理论体系逻辑结构的起始范畴,它包含经济法研究对象一切矛盾萌芽的规定性,从国家调节可推演出经济法理论体系逻辑结构的其他范畴、命题,它是经济法历史起点的反映,符合经济法发展历史与逻辑相统一的原则。     

欧共体竞争法与成员国竞争法关系初探

由于均对各自适用范围做扩张性解释,因而欧共体竞争法与成员国竞争法在适用范围上不可避免地产生了重叠, 二者构成了一利双重控制体系。但这种双重控制体系又是有条件的双重控制体系,即当二者之间有冲突时,应以共同体竞争法的效力为优先。随着统一大市场的形成以及从属原则被确立为欧盟法的基本原则,这种双重控制体系面临瓦解的可能,在未来有必要对两套法律体系的适用范围进行重新划定,从而使其各行其是,互不干涉,而且预计成员国竞争法的地位会得到相应提升,并发挥其应有的作用。     

判例法中的理性与命令

一尽管本杰明·卡多佐(Benjamin Cardozo)是我国涌现出来的三四个伟大法哲学家之一,但他很少,精确地说是从来没有被人们称为任何具体"法学理论"的创立者。于他而言,各种流派的法哲学代表了人类事务中的重要力量,他花费了很多时间致力于其研究。同时,他自己那并非中庸的法哲学却始终远离了理论争锋的角斗场。于他而言,这不是     

从美国法例看专利联营的反垄断法规制

本文系统介绍了专利联营的概念、类型及形成原因,从反垄断法的角度分析了专利联营所带来的促进竞争和反竞争的结果,考察了美国专利联营规制的历史发展过程及几个典型案例,分析了专利联营的理论和实践,以期对我国的理论和实践提供借鉴。