Reference Obligation-basedReference EntityDeliverable ObligationsRestructuring as Credit EventPhysical SettlementCancellability   ContinuityRefinancingRefinancingDesignation of the Successor Credit AgreementDesignation of Substitute Reference ObligationCredit Events and RestructuringSettlementPhysical SettlementCash SettlementDeliverable Obligations    相似文献   

2.
Emissions trading in the European Union     
Roberts  Rhian; Staples  Chris 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):5-17
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU ETS will undergo a number of changes consequentupon the commencement of the first Kyoto Commitment Period on1 January 2008.
  • This article considers the existing EU ETSframework and also the key developments that are anticipatedin the European emissions market for 2008–2012.
  • A secondarymarket for trading EUAs has already developed and this market,together with the standard-form documentation used, is discussed.
  • Inconclusion, the article questions the future of emissions tradingin Europe—particularly after the current Kyoto targetsexpire in 2012.
  European businesses entered a carbon-constrained economic environmenton 1 January 2005. For some, the impacts were immediate anddirect in the form of caps on their emissions. The majorityfelt it indirectly and more slowly through increased energycosts as the perceived cost of compliance was passed on by generators.The full impacts are not yet clear, but a quiet revolution is. . . [Full Text of this Article]
                  CDM projectsJI projects                      相似文献   

3.
The evolution of regulatory enforcement action in the UK capital markets: a case of 'less is more'?     
MacNeil  Iain 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):345-369
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Formal enforcement action is a relatively rare occurrencewithin the UK capital markets regulatory framework. This characteristicdistinguishes the UK from the US, where there is a more intensefocus on enforcement, both public and private.
  • Several featuresof the UK regulatory system contribute towards a low incidenceof enforcement. Some of these features are embedded in the statutoryframework, but the FSA has played a key role in the developmentof enforcement policy, while the continuing presence of self-regulationin the form of the Combined Code has also played a part.
  • Thefocus on risk-based regulation in the UK has been a major influencefor enforcement policy. The move to more principles-based regulationhas also been a factor but one that is more difficult to interpret.If it is correct to assume that principles-based regulationdoes not affect the intensity of regulation, then the effecton the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
      The move towards more principles-based regulationThe enforcement implications of principles-based regulation       Public enforcementPrivate enforcement   Sanctions: the statutory optionsSettlements: process and incentivesProcedural complications      相似文献   

4.
The pan-European retail market are we there yet?     
Burn  Lachlan; Wells  Boyan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(3):263-280
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • When the EU Prospectus Directive was introduced inlate 2003, there was great optimism that it would finally leadto the long awaited pan-EEA retail capital market.
  • This articleasks whether the Directive has achieved this result and looks,in particular, at the disclosure regime relating to the admissionof debt securities to EEA-regulated markets and the public offeringof such securities in the EEA.
  • A number of impediments to thecross-border retail market, that are completely separate fromdisclosure, are examined.
  • In conclusion, the article discusseswhether, in fact, expectations for the Prospectus Directivein this area were set too high and could never be met and looksat what more needs to be done in order to achieve the goal ofa single retail debt market in the EEA.
 
  The EU Prospectus Directive1 (the ‘PD’) was introducedin late 2003 amid a flurry of optimism and . . . [Full Text of this Article]       (a) Use of programmes(b) Derogation         Unfair contractsFinancial promotionAdvertising regime    相似文献   

5.
How to compare regulatory regimes     
Wood  Philip R. 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):332-344
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
It is the policy of this Journal to only publish material thathas not been published previously. However, an exception hasbeen made with this article as the work from which it has beendrawn has only recently published. This article is taken fromPhilip Wood's Regulation of International Finance, one of aseries of nine works by Philip Wood on the law of practice ofInternational Finance, published by Sweet & Maxwell in 2007.Philip Wood is a member of the Editorial Board of Capital MarketsLaw Journal. Many readers of Capital Markets Law Journal aroundthe world will not have had the chance to read this very topicalarticle which is of exceptional quality and Capital MarketsLaw Journal is very pleased to make it available to the widercapital markets community.                 TheEditors
Key points
  • This article examines the criteria which might usefullybe . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                Identity and independence of regulatorsCodification of the lawCriminalization of the lawXenophobia and protectionismDegree of investor protectionFreedom index      相似文献   

6.
A transactional approach to the Hague Securities Convention     
Bjerre  Carl S.; Rocks  Sandra M. 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):109-125
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Transactions involving intermediated securities –ie securities that are held in an account with a broker, bank,clearing agency or other intermediary – demand a highdegree of ex ante legal certainty. However, for intermediatedsecurities accounts and transactions that reach across bordersas is increasingly prevalent, the traditional conflicts of lawrules for many of the most important commercial law issues failto provide this certainty.
  • The Hague Securities Conventionprovides a modern and practical approach for determining theapplicable law. In most cases, the express terms of the agreementbetween the applicable account holder and its intermediary willbe determinative, including as against third parties, providedthat at the time of the agreement the intermediary is engagedin the business of maintaining securities accounts in the specifiedjurisdiction. The Convention is expected to be ratified in somenations fairly soon.
  • Once the Convention becomes effective,it . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
    Scope of the law chosen: issues, definitions and internationalityExpress agreement in either of two formsThe Qualifying Office requirement   The fall-back rulesPre-Convention agreements    相似文献   

7.
Disclosure in the EEA securities markets--making sense of the puzzle     
Burn  Lachlan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):139-153
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • This article looks at the various elements of thedisclosure regimes for issuers that are admitted to EEA-regulatedmarkets, including the initial requirement for the productionof a prospectus on admission and on-going requirements to discloseprice sensitive information as it arises and to make regularreports to the market.
  • After a brief analysis of some of thesimilarities and differences between the various regimes, thearticle makes an attempt to reconcile the differences by lookingat each regime in the context of the others and viewing themas a continuum.
  • Finally, remaining problems concerning multi-jurisdictionliability for disclosure in the EEA and potential liabilityfor forward-looking disclosure are discussed.
 
  With a sly dig at the abusive market practices of his time,Oscar Wilde wrote that ‘private information is practicallythe source of every large modern fortune’.1 For some,it still is, despite the efforts of legislators and . . . [Full Text of this Article]     PurposeRetrospective disclosureDisclosure of future events   Improving the quality of disclosureAvoidance of time-wastingAvoidance of vexatious litigation   Sensible liability regimeSensible interpretation   Multi-jurisdiction liabilityForward-looking disclosure—foresight, hindsight and second sight    相似文献   

8.
Hedge fund regulation, market discipline and the Hedge Fund Working Group     
McVea  Harry 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2009,4(1):63-84
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Against a general background of suspicion, criticismand even hostility, the recently formed Hedge Fund Working Group(HFWG), comprising 14 leading fund managers based mainly inthe United Kingdom, published their Final Report in January2008.
  • The Report is based on standards of best practice (the‘Standards’ of which there are 28) that are, inthe final analysis, to be administered by a newly establishedHedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB)—a self-regulatory bodycharged with the responsibility of keeping the Standards up-to-dateand ‘fit for purpose’.
  • Borrowing from both theFinancial Services Authority's Principles for Business, whichrepresent bold statements of good business practice within theUK's financial services sector, and the Combined Code on CorporateGovernance's voluntary approach of ‘comply or explain’,the Standards are heralded by the HFWG as ‘an exercisein market discipline, based on disclosure’.
  • The unprecedentednature of recent financial market . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                   相似文献   

9.
Only connect--the importance of considering disclosure requirements in the light of their legal consequences     
Burn  Lachlan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(1):41-54
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • This article explains why the recent TransparencyDirective led to an unintended change in law in the United Kingdomrelating to liability for annual and other reports by listedcompanies. The change was the result of a misunderstanding ofthe fact that the expressed or implied purpose of disclosurecan act as a trigger for liability in negligence. The articleargues that new disclosure requirements should always be reviewedin the light of the liability that will be imposed on thoseresponsible for the disclosure, so that costs and benefits canbe correctly balanced and prompt, reliable and relevant disclosurewill be encouraged.
  • The new liability regime for reports inthe United Kingdom is considered and it is argued that the regimeshould logically be extended beyond company reports to the fullrange of disclosures required of companies that are admittedto regulated markets.
  • The article concludes by . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
             
  首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • European Loan Only Credit Default Swap (‘LCDS’)documentation was published by the International Swaps &Derivatives Association, Inc. in the form of a Standard TermsSupplement and Form of Confirmation for use with Credit DerivativeTransactions on Leveraged Loans on 30 July 2007 (the ‘EuropeanLCDS’).
  • This article reviews some of the changes thathave been made since the first circulation of the draft EuropeanLCDS documentation on 2 May 2006 (the ‘Draft LCDS’).
  • Acomparison between the Draft LCDS, the current form of the EuropeanLCDS and the US LCDS (defined in the article below) providesan insight into how the development of the European LCDS hasrequired a compromise to be made between the needs and demandsof various market participants and the specifics of the Europeanleveraged loan market (as more fully described in our recentarticle1) and indicates points of convergence between the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
   1. General    2. What has remained unchanged?    3. What has changed?    4. Summary    1. Sector coverage    2. Allocation    3. Treatment of new entrants    4. Installation closure    5. Auctioning    6. Trading    7. The Kyoto Protocol    8. Linking to the Kyoto Mechanisms    9. Buying from clean development and joint implementation projects    10. The primary market    11. The secondary market    12. Existing documentation for trading EUAs    13. Deliverability issues for Kyoto Credits    14. Eligibility requirements for emissions trading    15. The International Transaction Log    16. Commitment period reserves    17. The impact on secondary trading documentation    18. The voluntary market for CERs    19. The future for emissions trading    1. Introduction    2. Risk-based regulation    3. Principles-based regulation    4. Self-regulation and market discipline    5. The allocation of responsibility for regulatory contraventions    6. Public and private enforcement    7. Settlement and sanctions    8. Synthesis and speculation    9. Conclusions    1. Introduction    2. The Prospectus Directive    3. Different implementation across the EEA    4. Mismatch between law and market practice—Retail cascades    5. Liability    6. Final terms or supplements?    7. Passporting    8. Impact of other laws    9. Conclusion    1. Jurisdictions of the world    2. Legal families for the purposes of financial law    3. Characteristics of measurement criteria    4. General financial law criteria    5. Application of general criteria to legal systems    6. Legal and political infrastructure as a criterion    7. Commonality of underlying regulatory law    8. Criteria for measuring regulatory law    9. Comparison of the US and the UK    10. Background influences on the regulatory regime    1. The Convention as a response to evolving markets    2. Certainty as to applicable law as the result of express agreement    3. Fall-back rules and pre-Convention agreements    4. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. The pieces    3. Some analysis    4. Why does it matter?    5. Resolving the problem    6. Remaining problems    7. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. Disclosure (including ‘side letters’)    3. Valuation concerns    4. Risk management    5. Fund governance    6. Market abuse    7. Activism    8. An assessment    9. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. Reports under the Transparency Obligations Directive    3. Liability for disclosure under English law    4. What went wrong?    5. Making the logical connections    6. Achieving the right threshold for liability    7. The importance of consistency in liability for market disclosures